ISSN 2409-7616

Bykasova L.V., Samoylova A.N.

ANTHROPOLOGICAL DIMENSION DISTANCE EDUCATION

UDC 378

DOI: http://doi.org/10.15350/2409-7616.2024.1.10

Bykasova L.V.1 (Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation) – moeve-25-moeve@yandex.ru; Samoylova A.N.2 (Taganrog, Russian Federation) – s_a_n_l@mail.ru

1Rostov State Economic University

2Southern Federal University

Abstract. From the standpoint of epistemological and functional approaches, the article attempts to reflect on distance education through the prism of anthropology, whose evolution, formation and development were carried out in the process of historical, social, cultural formation of the subject and society. Consideration of the multidimensionality of the phenomenon of distance education helps to identify its conceptual ideas, methodological framework, and methodological content; determining the semantic and connotational load, reflecting the cultural traditions of society, the specificity of individual sciences, the accentuation of the subject in the field of distance education, the universality of its status; identifying lines of demarcation to determine the geometry and effects of distance education, the possibility of its development under the influence of scientific thought, which allows us to conclude that distance education has an anthropological foundation. The authors conduct a typological analysis of the concepts introduced into the framework of scientific research, which states the anthropological dimension of distance education, describes the increasing level of cognitive complexity of educational practices, scales the information trail of the subject of modern education, his passionarity. Interest in the subject of modern education – homo informaticus – is explained by the need to harmonize the personality structure of a young person of the 21st century, striving to successfully overcome social turbulence, to choose the optimal trajectory from a wide educational palette that allows one to open new horizons of knowledge, comprehend thought forms, learn new languages ​​and approaches to comprehend the world. The attention of the scientific community to the development of distance education through the prism of anthropology is explained by its mission, its role in modernizing the infrastructure of society, increasing the reliability and efficiency of the ecosystem, and demonstrating new standards of modern educational design.

Keywords: distance education, anthropology, cognition, culture, thinking ability, communication.

References:

  1. Agapov O. D. Anthropological practice as an impossible possibility. News of Saratov University. New episode. Series: Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2021, no. 21, pp. 4–8. (In Russian). DOI: 10.18500/1819-7671-2021-21-1-4-8
  2. Bykasova L.V., Samoilova A.N. Networking: per sspera. Bulletin of PGGPU. Psychological and pedagogical sciences, 2021, no. 1, pp. 114-122. (In Russian). DOI: 10.24412/2308-717X-2021-2-114-122
  3. Varzhavin A.A. Conceptual and terminological field of the problem of developing reflective and predictive skills of future teachers in the digital educational environment of the university. CITISE, 2023, no. 4, pp. 78-87. (In Russian). DOI: 10.15350/2409-7616.2023.4.07
  4. Volkov A.V., Volkova S.V. Homo educationandus in the mirror of philosophical anthropology. Perspectives of science and education, 2020, no. 6 (48), pp. 22-30. (In Russian). DOI: 10.32744 / pse.2020.6.2
  5. Vygotsky L.S. Psychology of development. Moscow, Yurayt Publ., 2023, 281 p. (In Russian). ISBN 978-5-534-07290-7.
  6. Gazman O.S. Non-classical education: from authoritarian pedagogy to the pedagogy of freedom.  Moscow, MIROS Publ., 2022, 296 p. (In Russian). ISBN 5-7084-0230-X
  7. Guryanov N.Yu., Guryanova A.V. Digital globalization in the context of the development of the digital economy and digital technologies. Bulletin of Moscow State Regional University. Series: Philosophical Sciences, 2020, no. 3, pp. 63-69. (In Russian). DOI: 10.18384/2310-7227-2020-3-63-69
  8. Dedyukhin D.D., Balandin A.A., Popova E.I. Distance learning in the higher education system: problems and prospects. World of Science. Pedagogy and psychology, 2020, no. 5, pp. 1-11. (In Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/qyfnls
  9. Law of the Russian Federation. Dated December 29, 2012 No. 273-FZ “On education in the Russian Federation”. Available at:  https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_140174/ (accessed 24 November 2023).
  10. Ivanov A.V. Conceptual ideas of new education in the conditions of the information educational paradigm. CITISE, 2022, no. 4, pp. 188-198. (In Russian). DOI: 10.15350/2409-7616.2022.4.18
  11. Ivanov A.V. Methodological support of spiritual and moral education at different age stages of development. Alma Mater (Bulletin of Higher School), 2021, no. 4, pp. 34-41. (In Russian). DOI: 10.20339/AM.04-21.034
  12. Leontiev A.N. Activity, consciousness, personality. Moscow, Meaning Publ., 2021, 352 p. (In Russian). ISBN: 978-5-458-03987-1          
  13. Prirodova O.F., Danilova A.A., Morgun A.N. Structure of the digital educational environment: normative, legal and methodological aspects. Pedagogy and psychology of education, 2020, no. 1, pp. 9-30. (In Russian). DOI: 10.31862/2500-297X-2020-1-9-30
  14. Rul D.V. The evolution of the educational system in Russia in the 19th century. Reforms and their consequences. Student, 2020, no. 5, pp. 58-66. (In Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/gwdhis
  15. hilosophical dictionary. Moscow, Respublika, 2003, p. 380. (In Russian). ISBN 985-428-636-3.
  16. Croitoru I., Munteanu H. The moralreligious education – a support of    selfconscience training. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences,2019, vol. 116, pp. 2155-2163. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.536
  17. Gibson D., Broadley T., Downie J., Wallet P. Evolving Learning Paradigms: Re-Setting Baselines and Collection Methods of Information and Communication Technology in Education Statistics. Educational Technology & Society, 2018, vol. 21 (2), pp. 62–73.
  18. Kononova O.A., Podbereznyi V.V., Samojlova A.N. Establishment of the subject in the digital education: cognitive practices synthesis. In R. Valeeva (Ed.), Teacher Education- IFTE 2019, vol 78, European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, European Publisher, pp. 140-149. DOI: 10.15405/epsbs.2020.01.19
  19. Kulik A.A., Lazareva P.V., Ippolitova N.V. Competency-based approach and competencies in higher education: a theoretical review. Educational Psychology Practices in Europe and the Middle East, 2020, vol. 8, (2), pp. 645-651. DOI: 10.20511/pyr2020.v8nSPE2.645

For citation: Bykasova L.V., Samoylova A.N. Anthropological dimension distance education. CITISE, 2024, no. 1, pp. 117-128. DOI: http://doi.org/10.15350/2409-7616.2024.1.10