UDC 378:004

DOI: http://doi.org/10.15350/2409-7616.2023.2.20

Plaschevaya E.V.¹ (Blagoveshchensk, Russian Federation) – elena-plashhevaja@rambler.ru, Poskrebysheva D.A.² (Astrakhan, Russian Federation) – olgaiva@astgmu.ru, Lanina S.Yu.³ (Blagoveshchensk, Russian Federation) swetl.lanina@yandex.ru

¹Amur State Medical Academy

²Astrakhan State Medical University

³Blagoveshchensk State Pedagogical University

Abstract. The problem of learning to work with information, with information sources is not new. However, in modern conditions of digitalization, openness of global information resources, this task, in our opinion, acquires new relevance. For the future doctor, the solution to the problem of learning to work with information in a digitalization environment can be solved within the framework of the formation of information and digital competencies with maximum involvement of students in the information and educational environment of the university. I understand the importance of solving this problem, we performed a meta-analysis of work in this subject area, qualitative assessment of the reliability of the results was carried out by the method of expert assessments, quantitative assessment – by the method of calculating the concordation coefficient (consistency) of expert opinions. It was found that there is a weak relationship between the knowledge of students and the author’s methods being implemented, as well as a pronounced connection between methods and skills. In addition, it was concluded that modern digital technologies used in a medical university in teaching physics have their own specifics. It is noted that despite the basic basis of physics in medicine, specialized or specialized knowledge and skills are required, taking into account the knowledge of a specific branch of physics. It was revealed that in a medical university, when studying diagnostic methods and procedures, the main thing is to train skills when working with these devices, which leads to the need to use exactly those digital technologies that would help solve the problem of practical orientation of learning and assimilation of the physical foundations of medicine. It has been determined that the use of digital technologies contributes not only to mastering the experience of manipulating devices when working with patients, but also to working out the skills of critical analysis of various clinical cases.

Keywords: teaching physics to medical students, working with information in digitalization.

References: 

1. Khamzin I.R., Khasanova S.L. Electronic interactive resources – a necessary component of education. Science and Education Publ., 2015. рр. 129-130.  (In Russian) .
2. Car J., Carlstedt-Duke J., Tudor Car L., Digital Health Education Collaboration Digital Education in Health Professions: The Need for Overarching Evidence Synthesis. J Med Internet Res, 2019, no. 21(2), Id. e12913. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/12913
3. Kuhn S., Müller N., Kirchgässner EDigital skills for medical students – qualitative evaluation of the curriculum 4.0 “Medicine in the digital age”. GMS J Med Educ, 2020, no.16. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma001353
4. Minashkin V.G., Prokhorov P.E. Statistical analysis of the use of digital technologies in organizations: regional aspect. Statistics and Economics, 2018, no. 15(5), pp. 51-62.  (In Russian). EDN: YRTDTV, DOI: 10.21686/2500-3925-2018-5-51-62
5. Moreva E.L. Problems of the transition to the digital economy: foreign recipes and Russian alternatives. Public administration. Electronic Herald, 2018, no. 70. pp. 344-359.  (In Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36321857
6. Dobrolyubova E. I. Assessment of the digital maturity of public administration. Information Society, 2021, no. 2, pp. 37-52. (In Russian). EDN: ZSEGML, DOI: 10.52605/16059921_2021_02_37
7. Gavronskaya Yu.Yu. Trends in modern education: digitalization, editorial and functional literacy. Chemistry at school, 2022, no. 1, pp. 17-21.  (In Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=47603412
8. Zeer E.F. Digital generation in the context of predicting the professional future. Education and science, 2021, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 153-184.  (In Russian). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2021-6-153-184
9. Zdor D.V., Savelyeva E.V., Zhuravlev D.M. Computer simulation as a method of interactive learning in the context of digital transformation of education. Education and law, 2022, no.3, pp.198-202. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24412/2076-1503-2022-3-198-20210   
10. Ljungblad A.-L. Pedagogical Relational Teachership (PeRT) – a multi-relational perspective. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 2019, no. 25, pp.1-17. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2019.1581280
11. Olofsson A.D., Fransson G., Lindberg, J.A. study of the use of digital technology and its conditions with a view to understanding what ‘adequate digital competence’ may mean in a national policy initiative. Educational Studies, 2019, no. 46, pp.1-17. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2019.1651694
12. Panchenko E.I. Inter-subject integration of the course of physics, mathematics at a medical university. International Journal of Applied and Fundamental Research, 2016, no. 4-1, pp. 244-245.  (In Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25675027
13. Fischer-Tenhagen C., Meier J., Pohl A. “Do not look at me like that”: Is the facial expression score reliable and accurate to evaluate pain in large domestic animals? A systematic review. Front Vet Sci, 2022, no. 6, Id. е1002681. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.1002681  
14. Baashar, Y., Alkawsi G., Mustafa A. Toward Predicting Student’s Academic Performance Using. Applied Sciences, 2022, no. 12, Id. е1289. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app12031289
15. Wan A., Wan N., Ahmad R. E-Community Program: A Study on ICT. Springer, Cham Publ.,2019. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34032-2_65 
16. Alghail A., Abbas M., Yao L. Where are the higher education institutions from knowledge protection: a systematic review. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 2023, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 387-413. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-09-2020-0166
17. Divina TV, Petrakova EA, Vishnevsky M.S. The main methods of analyzing expert assessments. Economics and business: theory and practice, 2019, no. 7, pp.42-44.  (In Russian). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24411/2411-0450-2019-11072
18. O’Doherty D, Dromey M, Lougheed J.I. Briers and Solutions for Online Learning in Medical Education – Comprehensive Review. BMC Medical Education, 2018, no. 18, pp. 130-137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1240-0 
19. Saed S., Rastoji A., Bansal A. Future of e-learning in medical education – perception, readiness and challenges in a developing country. Frontiers in Education, 2021, vol. 6, pp.1-9. DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2021.598309

For citation: Plaschevaya E.V., Poskrebysheva D.A., Lanina S.Yu. Digital technologies when working with information in teaching physics in a medical university. CITISE, 2023, no. 2, pp. 236-245. DOI: http://doi.org/10.15350/2409-7616.2023.2.20