UDC 371

Ketoev K.E.¹ (Vladikavkaz, Russian Federation) – kesaevz@bk.ru 

¹North Ossetian State University named after K.L. Khetagurov

Abstract. The article is devoted to the problem of studying the potential of systematic feedback, thanks to which the teacher has information about the stage of development of each of the students, what needs to be done to improve the level of this process. Feedback in the educational process can be manifested in different forms. in establishing “subject-subject” relations between the teacher and students. An important strategic direction of the domestic education system is a comprehensive improvement of the forms and methods of monitoring students’ knowledge at all stages of the educational process. One of the promising areas in education is the development of new models for implementing effective knowledge monitoring based on systematic feedback between the teacher and students. Systematic feedback, unlike conventional communication, is not a one-way process, but a joint discussion of specific educational tasks, planning further actions, and consolidation of successful results. This approach to monitoring students’ achievements helps to solve certain problems of modernization of education, in particular – establishing “subject-subject” relations between teachers and students, creating mechanisms for sustainable development of the educational process, transforming educational and cognitive activity from a reproductive form into productive cognitive activity, etc. Systematic feedback contributes to the success of the educational process, students’ awareness of their own level of assimilation of universal educational activities, if it is based on “subject-subject” interaction of participants in the educational process. In this regard, the author of the article argues that improving the types and methods of monitoring students’ knowledge based on “subject-subject” relations is becoming one of the priority areas in the education system as a whole.

Keywords: training, education, monitoring of students’ knowledge, subject-subject relations, systematic feedback.

References:

1. Alborov V.Z. Problems of modern education and the main mechanisms for their resolution. CITISE, 2020, no. 4 (26), pp. 58-65. (In Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/ribbmt
2. Ananko S.Ya., Kirichek L.T., Krivoshapka A.V. Problems of the quality of education. International Journal of Experimental Education, 2014. no. 3-2, pp. 182-183. (In Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/rzspfj
3. Baiserkeev A.E. Innovation in education and training. Problems of modern science and education, 2016, no. 21 (63), pp. 93-96. (In Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/whkjgz
4. Balikoeva M.I. Factors of successful pedagogical interaction in the “teacher-student” system. Internet journal Naukovedenie, 2015, vol. 7, no. 5 (30), pp. 172. (In Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/vjkrlb
5. Bekoeva M.I., Gadziev A.A. Innovative processes in the management system of a modern school. CITISE, 2023, no. 2 (36), pp. 300-307. (In Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/mwcccc
6. Varzhavin A.A., Uvarina N.V. The Role of the Polysubject Approach in Organizing the Interaction of Education Subjects. CITISE, 2024, no. 1 (39), pp. 140-153. (In Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/asrfwz
7. Gerasimova V.A. The Relationship between the Concepts of “Self-Education” and “Independent Work” in Modern Pedagogical Science. Stolypinsky Vestnik, 2023, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 12. (In Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/npnlhk
8. Gerasimova O.Yu. The Power of Feedback. Pedagogical Science and Practice, 2019, no. 3 (25), pp. 104-107. (In Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/spmyow
9. Granichina O.A. On the issue of improving the assessment of the quality of assimilation of an academic discipline. Scientific notes of the St. Petersburg state institute of psychology and social work, 2007, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 95-99. (In Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/jwwaub
10. Klipakova D.M. The value of pedagogical discourse in the modern educational environment. CITISE, 2023, no. 2 (36), pp. 178-190. (In Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/ciqaks
11. Kovshova E.S. Teacher and student: the basics of interaction and mutual understanding in the education system. Sociology of education, 2017, no. 4, pp. 41-59. (In Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/zcndmt
12. Koroleva M.V. Formative assessment technology as a tool for improving the quality of feedback: from the experience of application in English lessons. Magisterium. Magazine about the teacher and for the teacher, 2023, no. 7, pp. 136-140. (In Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/uwiivg
13. Lapteva M.D., Zimnyaya I.A. Fostering responsibility and independence in schoolchildren. Education of schoolchildren, 2012, no. 1, pp. 26-35. (In Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/onypgr
14. Latypova E.Kh., Kashapova R.A., Aminova L.Ya. Traditional and innovative teaching technologies. Correctional and Pedagogical Education: Electronic Journal, 2022, no. 2-2 (32), pp. 2-5. (In Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/ccqiqt
15. Naumenko Zh.N. Essential characteristics of the concept of “interaction” in the “teacher-student” system. Bulletin of Polesie State University. Series of social and humanitarian sciences, 2020, no. 2, pp. 53-59. (In Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/vwonof

For citation: Ketoev K.E. The role of systematic feedback in establishing «subject-subject» relations between the teacher and students. CITISE, 2024, no. 4, pp. 591-598.