UDC 371.3

Bizyaeva N.D.¹ (Moscow, Russian Federation) – ndbzv@yandex.ru

¹School No. 2097

Abstract. This article examines a particular methodological strategy for the development of critical thinking in the course of meaningful work of primary school students with video content in history. The relevance of the study is dictated by the need to change approaches to the education and upbringing of schoolchildren in Russia, which are based on the idea of developing the student’s personality. This shifts the emphasis from simple assimilation of knowledge to the comprehensive and active development of the child, when the process of obtaining new educational information is carried out in the course of active and conscious activity of students. At the same time, thanks to changes in approaches to the acquisition and internalization of knowledge by students, the child’s personality develops, since he becomes a subject of the educational process and therefore is required to be able to assimilate, evaluate and use the acquired knowledge. In this regard, the development of critical thinking is of particular importance, which confirms the relevance of the research carried out, which lies in understanding the methods, techniques and means of effectively developing critical thinking in modern students based on cognitive activity during the assimilation of educational information through video content. The idea of implementing the presented practice is that students, before starting to watch video materials on the topic of the lesson during a history lesson, receive a partially completed reference note and discuss with the teacher the rules for filling it out. Then, while watching the video, the children carefully listen and watch the educational material, and depending on the material itself and the level of preparation of the students, the teacher can make meaningful pauses so that the children can fill in the gaps in their supporting notes on the topic of the history lesson. The peculiarity of this practice is that it can be used during the study of other academic subjects.

Keywords: TRKMChP, meaningful reading, video content, case, video materials, history, meaningful viewing of the video, supporting summary.

References:

1. Angelova O.Yu., Petrova O.V., Prokhorova M.V. et al. Participation of youth in the development of the territory: assessment of potential and development of digital interaction tools (on the example of the “festival of entrepreneurial ideas” in Nizhny Novgorod) // Regional Economics: Theory and Practice, 2019, vol. 17, no. 2 (461). pp. 331-344. (In Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/pnxxev
2. Androsova O.V., Kovaleva O.V., Lozbenev S.N. et al. Supporting notes: their role in teaching students at the Faculty of Dentistry. Smolensk Medical Almanac, 2016, no. 2. pp. 56-59. (In Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/wkrhxf
3. Bizyaeva N.V. Konstantinova N.D. Formation of a functionally literate personality in the system of teaching “Native Word” K.D. Ushinsky. News of the Volgograd State Pedagogical University, 2023, no. 4 (177), pp. 20-25. (In Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/detumw
4. Buzan T. Intelligence Cards. The Complete Guide to a Powerful Thinking Tool. Moscow, Mann, Ivanov and Ferber Publ., 2021. 208 p. (In Russian).
5. Gorobets L.N. Development of critical thinking through reading and writing as a meta-subject technology. Monograph. Moscow, Sputnik+ LLC Publ., 2016. pp. 655-660. (In Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/utifqk
6. Gorobets L.N., Biryukov I.V., Popova T.P. Functional literacy as the main trend of modern education. World of Science, Culture, Education, 2022, no. 3(94), pp. 84-86. (In Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/oqhwlj
7. Zagashev I.O., Zair-bek I.I. Critical thinking: development technology. St. Petersburg: Skifia Publ., 2003. 283 p. (In Russian).
8. Zair-Bek S.I. Development of critical thinking in the classroom. Moscow, Education Publ., 2004. (In Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/qttadr
9. Mushtavinskaya I.V. Meta-subject educational technologies for the formation of functional reading literacy. Physics at School, 2023, no. S2, pp. 64-69. (In Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/whazuj
10. Kodzhaspirova G.M. Pedagogical dictionary. Moscow, Academia Publ., 2005. 175 p. (In Russian).
11. Konstantinova N.D. Key values of national education in the works of K.D. Ushinsky. Problems of Modern Education, 2020, no. 2, pp. 103-107. (In Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/yzonoo
12. Steele J. L., Meredith K., Temple C. et al. Fundamentals of critical thinking: an interdisciplinary program. Moscow, IOO Publ., 1997. 198 p. (In Russian).
13. Kosaretsky S.G., Barannikov K.A., Belikov A.A. et al. Russian school: the beginning of the XXI century. Monographs. Moscow, Higher School of Economics Publ., 2019. 432 p. (In Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/kozjzw
14. Tkacheva L. L. Technologies for the development of critical thinking. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series: Linguistics, 2008, no. 16(116), pp. 95-96. (In Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/jtayqv
15. Shatalov V.F. Teach everyone, teach everyone. Moscow, Pedagogy Publ., 1988. pp. 141-204. (In Russian).

For citation: Bizyaeva N.D.  Technology for meaningful student work with video content in history lessons at basic school. CITISE, 2024, no. 2, pp. 106-114.