ISSN 2409-7616

Sevostyanov P.I., Shunkov V.E., Makaev A.R.


UDC 339.977:327.8


Sevostyanov P.I.1 (Moscow, Russian Federation) –, Shunkov V.E.2 (Moscow, Russian Federation) –, Makaev A.R.1 (Moscow, Russian Federation) –

1Plekhanov Russian Economic University

2Research Institute of Systems Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Abstract. The article analyzes the use of satellite technologies – modern innovative means of technological control of greenhouse gas emissions into the atmosphere. In order to achieve the indicators stipulated by the 2015 Paris Agreement, it is necessary to create effective emission control systems on a national and global scale. Satellite technologies are one of the priority ways to control greenhouse gas emissions into the environment. The use of satellites provides enhanced opportunities for monitoring greenhouse gas emissions, reducing the risks of uncontrolled emissions – the consequences of emergencies, as well as the prompt elimination of possible leaks and emission control in accordance with international decarbonization agreements. In addition, the carbon dioxide emissions accounting system and the carbon emissions monitoring system are a powerful policy tool that will allow Governments to regulate the rate of decarbonization not only in their own countries. The authors believe that Earth remote sensing satellites are in fact the only objective means of controlling greenhouse gas emissions that allows independently and globally tracking the volumes and sources of emissions, therefore, when introducing quotas based on international agreements, it will be advantageous for developed countries to have satellite groupings for objective tracking of concentration plumes generated by emission points.

Keywords: zero emissions, satellite technologies, decarbonization, technological control, greenhouse gases, green economy, energy transition.


  1. Sevostyanov, P. I., Makaev, A. R. Political conditions of decarbonization within the framework of the energy transition: international risks and opportunities for Russia. Central Russian Bulletin of Social Sciences, 2023, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 72-86. (In Russian). URL:
  2. Sevostyanov, P. I., Matiukhin, A. V. “Energy transition” in the modern international agenda. Observer, 2022, no. 2 (385), pp. 19-31. (In Russian). URL:
  3. Andres R.J., Boden T.A., Higdon D.M. Gridded uncertainty in fossil fuel carbon dioxide emission maps, a CDIAC example.  Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, 2016, vol. 16, no. 23, pp. 14979–14995. DOI:
  4. Bondur V.G., Gordo K.A., Kladov, V.L. Spacetime Distributions of Wildfire Areas and Emissions of Carbon-Containing Gases and Aerosols in Northern Eurasia according to Satellite-Monitoring Data. Izvestiya, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics, 2017, vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 859-874. URL:
  5. Bovensmann H, Buchwitz M, Burrows J., et al. A remote sensing technique for global monitoring of power plant CO2 emissions from space and related applications. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 2010, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 781-811. URL:
  6. Bruhwiler L., Basu S., Butler J. H., et al. Observations of greenhouse gases as climate indicators. Climatic Change, 2021, vol. 165, p. 12. URL:  
  7. Gousset S., Croizé L., Le Coarer E., et al. NanoCarb hyperspectral sensor: on performance optimization and analysis for greenhouse gas monitoring from a constellation of small satellites. CEAS Space Journal, 2019, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 507-524. URL:
  8. Lespinas F., Wang,Y., Broquet G., et al. The potential of a constellation of low earth orbit satellite imagers to monitor worldwide fossil fuel CO2 emissions from large cities and point sources. Carbon Balance Manage, 2020, vol. 15, pp. 1-12. URL:
  9. Meng G., Wen, Y., Zhang, M., et al. The status and development proposal of carbon sources and sinks monitoring satellite system. Carb Neutrality, 2022, vol. 1, p. 32. DOI:
  10. Møller F., Grinderslev D., Werner M. Environmental Satellite Models for a Macroeconomic Model. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2003, vol. 24, pp. 197-212. URL:
  11. Nassar R., Hill T., McLinden C., et al. Quantifying CO2 emissions from individual power plants from space. Geophysical Research Letters, 2017, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 10045-10053. DOI:
  12. Nassar R., Sioris C., Jones D., et al. Satellite observations of CO2 from a highly elliptical orbit for studies of the Arctic and boreal carbon cycle. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2014, vol. 119, no. 5, pp. 2654-2673. DOI::
  13. Palacios-Orueta A., Chuvieco E., Parra A., et al. Biomass Burning Emissions: A Review of Models Using Remote-Sensing Dat. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2005, vol. 104, pp. 189-209. DOI:
  14. Ribeiro I.O., de Souza R.A.F., Andreoli R.V., et al. Spatiotemporal variability of methane over the Amazon from satellite observations. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2016, vol. 33, pp. 852-864.URL:  
  15. Salama D.S., Yousif M., Gedamy Y., et al. Satellite observations for monitoring atmospheric NO2 in correlation with the existing pollution sources under arid environment. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2022, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 4103-4121. URL:  

For citation: Sevostyanov P.I., Shunkov V.E., Makaev A.R. Assessment of greenhouse gas emissions using satellite systems: opportunities and prospects. CITISE, 2023, no. 4, pp. 136-146. DOI: