ISSN 2409-7616

Vyshyvanaya E.N.


UDC 378.14


Vyshyvanaya E.N.1 (Podolsk, Russian Federation) –

1Tolbinskaya Secondary School named after the Hero of the Russian Federation test pilot N.D. Karimov

Abstract. This article describes in detail the evolution of the socio-historical process of team building. The author uses general scientific research methods (system synthesis, horizontal comparative analysis, forecasting, dialectical and other methods of theoretical research) in order to consider the history of the development of team building from the point of view of the process taking place in the organization. With the help of the analysis of special literature on the research problem, the author of the article explores the problem of forming a scientific and evidence-based view of the effectiveness of team-building activities as a fundamental concept of managerial management. Presents different scientific and theoretical views describing the root causes and prerequisites of team activity, ways of developing team skills in different time periods. The paper compares the historical conditions of the formation of Western and Eastern European mentalities. The researcher draws conclusions about the special way of domestic team building, taking into account the national flavor, the difficult spatial and numerical composition of the country, formed by the collaboration of Western and eastern civilizations. The article presents the materials of scientific research works of significant theorists and practitioners on the history of management development and rational labor organization. The concepts of working teams of Russian, Japanese and American management, as well as domestic, Western European and American scientific approaches to the development of the theory of team building are compared. The author suggests that the use of proven and time-tested effective models and approaches in managing the process of team building will have a positive impact on the process of reconstructing educational organizations into educational complexes. The practical significance of the study is to determine the prospects for choosing the methodological foundations and team-building functions of the heads of educational complexes, taking into account the international and Russian historical past on this topic and the national mentality. The presented cognitive practices on team building will allow to accumulate, enrich and broadcast cognitive experience and knowledge, expand interests on the research topic.

Keywords: genesis of team building, mentality, individualism, collectivism, organization management, people management technologies, scientific organization of labor, working groups, team, labor motivation, management.


  1. Beloborodova I.N. Water industry artels of the European North. Management consulting, 2014, no. 4 (64), pp. 161-173. (In Russian). URL:
  2. Berdyaev N.A. The fate of Russia. Moscow, AST, 2010. 333 p. (In Russian). ISBN 978-5-17-022084-7
  3. Verkhoglazenko V.N. Team building: basics of management and roles in a team. Live Psychology, 2017, vol .4, no. 1, pp. 49–74. (In Russian). URL:
  4. Vitke N.A. Organization of management and industrial development. Moscow, NKRKI USSR, 1925. 250 p. (In Russian).
  5. Vysheslavtsev B.P. Russian national character.  Questions of Philosophy,1995, no. 6, pp. 112-114. (In Russian).
  6. Volodin S.F. Problems of labor efficiency on the pages of journal periodicals of the 1920s. Historical journal: scientific research, 2017, no. 4, pp. 140-152. (In Russian). URL:
  7. Gaponenko A.L., Savelyeva M.V. Improving the efficiency of the team. Problems of theory and practice of management, 2017, no. 1 (57), pp. 55-60. (In Russian). URL:
  8. Zozulya O.A. Artel charter as a form of legal regulation of traditional handicraft production in Russia at the beginning of the 20th century. Bulletin of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, 2012, no. 4, pp. 24-30. (In Russian). URL:
  9. Karyakin A.M. Improving the management of enterprises in the field of science-intensive production and innovation based on the concept of work teams. Ivanovo, Ivanovo State Power Engineering University named after V. I. Lenin Publ., 1998. 168 p. (In Russian). ISBN 5-89482-030-6
  10. Cassidy F.H. On the paradox of Russia. Questions of Philosophy, 2000, no. 6, pp. 87-91. (In Russian).
  11. Klimenkova T.A., Shchedrina I.V. Effective use of existing models and approaches in managing the process of team building. Creative Economy, 2018, vol.12, no. 3, pp. 397–410. (In Russian). URL:
  12. Kovalevsky M.M. Tribal life in the present, recent and distant past: experience in the field of comparative ethnography and the history of law. St. Petersburg, Type. Shareholder. Brockhaus-Efron Islands Publ., 1911. (In Russian).
  13. Likhtanskaya O.I. Team building as a factor in management efficiency. Economics and Entrepreneurship, 2019, no. 4 (105), pp. 1113-1116. (In Russian). URL:
  14. Mayer R. About miracles and monsters. Stakhanovite movement and Stalinism. National history, 1993, no. 3, pp. 56-66. (In Russian).
  15. Marx K. Capital. Criticism of political economy. T.1. Book. 1. The process of capital production. – M.: Politizdat, 1988. 891s. (In Russian).  ISBN 5-250-00155-6
  16. Morozova I.S. Features of the team building process in Russian organizations. Young scientist, 2017, no. 39 (173), pp. 36-38. (In Russian). URL:
  17. Novikov I.A. Artel in Russia in the second half of the 19th – early 20th centuries. On the question of the definition of the term. Bulletin of the Tomsk State University, 2009, no. 4 (8), pp. 147-161. (In Russian).
  18. Petrov S.V. Team building as a way to improve the efficiency of the organization. Competence, 2019, no. 4, pp. 29–33. (In Russian). URL:
  19. Rappoport P.A. Construction artels of Ancient Rus’ and their customers. Construction and architecture, 1985, no. 4, pp. 80-89. (In Russian).
  20. Stavropoltseva S.V. Technology of laboratory team training: past, present, future. Teaching aid. Odessa, UNC APS of Ukraine Publ., 2007. 291 p. (In Russian).
  21. Strumilin S.G. To the problem of capital in the USSR. Planned economy, 1925, no. 2. pp. 40-65. (In Russian).
  22. Teslenko I.B., Eronin V.A. Team Building: Significance, Modern Methods and Russian Features. Economics and Entrepreneurship, 2018, no. 31 (90), pp. 718-721. (In Russian). URL:
  23. Trifonova Zh.N. Collectivism in the Soviet ideology and in the pedagogical system of A.S. Makarenko: Comparative Discourse. Social Pedagogy, 2019, no. 1, pp. 125-131. (In Russian). URL:
  24. Fedorov R.V., Vovk V.V. The essence of the simple partnership agreement and the historical analysis of its development in Russia. Horizons of the economy, 2021, no. 6 (65), pp. 100-104. (In Russian). URL:
  25. Khlevnyuk O. Forced labor in the economy of the USSR 1929-1941. Free Thought, 1992, no. 13, pp. 73-84. (In Russian).
  26. Iacocca Lee. Manager’s career, Moscow, Progress Publ., 1991. 384 p. (In Russian). ISBN 5-01-003291-0
  27. Bahry D. Society Transformed? Rethinking the Social Roots of Perestroika.  Slavic Review, 1993, vol, 52, no. 3, pp. 512-554.
  28. Beuerlein M.  History of Work Teams.  USA, TX, Denton, University of North Texas Publ., 1996. pp. 51213-19.
  29. Beuerlein M., Beuerlein S., Richardson S. Survey of Technical Professionals in Team: Summary Report. USA, TX, Denton:  Center for the Study of Work Teams, University of North Texas Publ., 1993.- 53 p.
  30. Brown M.G., Hitchcock D.E., Willard M.L. Why TQM Fails and What to Do about it. USA, NY: Richard D. Irwin Inc Publ., 1994. 252p.
  31. Gloger A. Knock-out fur Teamarbeit. Markt, 2000, no. 18, pp.9.

For citation: Vyshyvanaya E.N. Historical aspects of team building. CITISE, 2023, no. 1, pp. 131-143. DOI: