ISSN 2409-7616

Lushkina S.A.


UDC 374.1


Lushkina S.A.1  (Astrakhan, Russian Federation) –

1Astrakhan of the State Medical University

Abstract. As noted by many researchers, the present day younger generation is “digital aborigines”. Modern youth and students cannot imagine themselves without information or digital technologies, messengers, gadgets or cloud storages. They use multimedia software programs more often in their everyday life. However, digital technologies, according to the deepest conviction of researchers, teaching staff, parents of students and pupils, must contribute to the development of children’s personality, their creative abilities, professional self-identification and, subsequently to the transition into a specialist in this or that professional activity. Digital and information technologies offer wide opportunities for the implementation of human goals as well as for self-management. The author of the research brings up a hypothesis: if the students of medical universities apply digital technologies for solving everyday issues and tasks, then they have the to apply them in the process of self-management. For the confirmation/ contradiction of the given hypothesis we defined the terminological apparatus, we held questionnaire surveys of medical university students, methods of mathematical statistics were used for processing the obtained data. Due to the generalization of the results we distinguished 3 data groups. The first group made it possible to define the applied digital and information technologies used by medical university students as well as the fields of activity they are applied in. The second data group defined digital technologies that students apply for self-management. Having applied factorial analysis of the 35 questions of our questionnaire, Bartlett criterion evaluation, Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin index as well as orthogonal rotation (varimax), the obtained data was corrected, factor loading was defined, the quantity of factors was minimized. The third group allowed dividing the respondents into 2 cohorts according to the levels of digital technologies proficiency. 

Keywords: self-organization, digital competencies, medical students.


  1. Afanaseva N.A. Self-organization – a factor in the success of educational activities // Fundamental research, 2008, no. 2, pp. 20-21. (In Russian).
  2. Novikov A.M. Pedagogy: a dictionary of the system of basic concepts. Moscow,  Institute of Effective Technologies Publ., 2012. 228 p. (In Russian).EDN: PFNTHZ URL:
  3. Andreev V.I. Pedagogy of the higher school. Kazan, Kazan Federal University Publ., 2012.  156 p. (In Russian).
  4. Noskova T.N., Kulikova S.S. Formation of the competence of self-organization of students as the basis for learning in the modern educational environment. Izvestiya of the Russian State Pedagogical University. A.I. Herzen, 2009, no. 83, pp. 78-88. (In Russian). EDN: KFQRBZ  URL:
  5. Ganina O.G., Ivanchuk O.V. Theoretical foundations of the methodology for the formation of clinical thinking in future doctors when teaching physics at the university. CITISE. 2019, no. 3 (20), pp. 41. (In Russian). EDN: AMVOKQ URL:
  6. Ivanchuk O.V. Formation of diagnostic skills in students of medical universities. World of Science. Pedagogy and psychology, 2019, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 1. (In Russian). EDN: ZTFKZD  URL:
  7. Zimmerman B.J. Self-regulated learning and academic achievement. Routledge Publ., 2013. 336 p. DOI:
  8. Schneckenberg D., Ehlers W., Adelsberger H. Web 2.0 and Competently Oriented Learning Design, Opportunities and Implications for Higher Education.  British Journal of Educational Technology, 2018, vol. 42 (5), pp. 949-922. DOI:
  9. Kitsantas A., Dabbag N. The Role of Web 2.0 Technologies in Self-Regulatory Learning. New Directions of Teaching and Learning, 2017, vol. 122,  pp. 99-102. DOI:
  10. Winters F.I., Greene J.A., Costich C.M. Self-Regulation of Learning in Computer Learning Environments: A Critical Analysis. Overview of Educational Psychology, 2008,vol. 20 (4), pp. 429-444.
  11. Wang J.  Cloud computing technologies in writing class: Factors influencing students’ learning experience. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 2017, vol. 18, pp. 197-197. DOI:10.17718/tojde.328954
  12. Margaryan A., Littlejohn A., Voight G. Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies. Computers and Education, 2011, vol. 52 (2), pp. 429-440. DOI:
  13. Lai Ch., Gu M. Self-regulated extracurricular language learning using technologies // Computer Assisted Language Learning,  2011, vol. 24 (4), pp. 219-225. DOI:
  14. Gallardo E., Marquez L., Bullen M. Higher Education Students: Social and Academic Use of Digital Technology. RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society, 2015, vol. 12 (1), pp. 25-37. DOI:10.7238/rusc.v12i1.2078
  15. Yot-Dominguez C., Marcelo C. University students’ self-regulated learning using digital technologies. Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 2019, vol. 14, DOI:10.1186/s41239-017-0076-8
  16. Baggetun R., Wasson B. Self-regulated Learning and Open Writing. European Journal of Education, 2009, vol. 41 (2/4), pp.457-472. DOI:10.1111/j.1465-3435.2006.00276.x
  17. Koblova Yu.A. Social networks and the mechanism of distribution of informal rules. Bulletin of the Saratov State Socio-Economic University, 2014, no. 3 (52), pp. 14-17. .  (In Russian). EDN: TGZJLT URL:
  18. Ivanko A.F., Ivanko M.A., Likhtina E.K. Social networks as an element of information technology. Scientific Review. Fundamental and applied research, 2020, no. 1. (In Russian).

For citation:

Lushkina S.A. Digital skills of medical students and their application for self-organization. CITISE, 2022, no. 3, pp. 105-117. DOI: