ISSN 2409-7616

Degtyareva I.V., Barkova E.E.

MEASURES TO SUPPORT THE BALANCED DEVELOPMENT OF INNOVATIVE AND INVESTMENT PROCESSES (BY THE EXAMPLE OF DEVELOPED AND DEVELOPING COUNTRIES)

DOI: http://doi.org/10.15350/2409-7616.2022.2.49

UDC 330.3

Degtyareva I.V.1 (Ufa, Russian Federation) – E-mail: idegtjareva57@mail.ru, Barkova E.E.1 (Ufa, Russian Federation) – E-mail: k_barkova@mail.ru

1Ufa State Petroleum Technical University

Abstract. The primary task of the government of any country is to find new resources and ways to support economic growth, especially in the context of the systemic crisis observed in the past few years. This issue is relevant for both developed and developing economies, where new economic relations are being formed. An indispensable condition for the development of a modern economy is the constant increase in the role of innovations, which cannot be implemented without investment. It is innovations that constantly stimulate development, progress and the process of adaptation of modern economies to a changing global environment. It is necessary to direct investment flows to their development and commercialization. The purpose of this study is to identify the relationship between innovation and investment processes, and what support measures are used to stimulate these processes in countries with different levels of development. The urgent need for development in many parts of the world points to the importance of the stable implementation of innovation and investment processes, since innovation and investment act as the main “engine of growth and development”. Results. The study revealed the general properties of innovation and investment processes, which in modern conditions, due to the acceleration of scientific and technological development, has led to the fusion of these processes into one. It has been established that investment and innovation processes are able to mutually influence each other. For the stable development of the economy, it is necessary to maintain a balance of investment and innovation processes, using for this purpose certain support measures that correspond to the level of development of countries. Conclusions. An analysis of the state support measures for innovation and investment processes in developed and developing countries showed that the measures and instruments used by the state are the main incentive for the balanced development of innovation and investment processes. Many of the measures considered are also applied in Russia, however, they have not yet brought a significant result, due to the peculiarities of the conditions for the implementation of innovation and investment processes in the domestic economy.

Keywords: innovation and investment process, innovations, support measures, state grants, improvement of legal and social institutions, developed countries, developing countries.

References:

  1. Babina K.I. Grant as one of the ways to finance scientific institutions: features, problems, prospects. Bulletin of the Saratov State Socio-Economic University, 2014, no. 5 (54), pp. 170-173. (In Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22857942
  2. Barkova E.E. Changing approaches to understanding investments and their relationship with innovations. Ufa, Ufa State Aviation Technical University Publ., 2021. pp. 82-86. (In Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=46176293
  3. Barkova E.E. Interdisciplinary approach to understanding the innovation process as a factor in socio-economic development. Ufa, Bashkir State University Publ., 2020. pp. 77-86. (In Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43076941
  4. Belyaeva I.V. Methodological foundations for the formation of a favorable innovation and investment climate in the country. Bulletin of the Tambov University. Series: Humanities, 2010, no. 3 (83), pp. 18-23. (In Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=14309069
  5. Naumov D.V. Features of the investment and innovation process in modern conditions. Theoretical Economics, 2017, no. 6(42), pp. 89-96. (In Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36580786
  6. Sirotkina N.G. Implementation of the innovative potential of public procurement in Russia. Management Sciences, 2017, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 59-67. (In Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30458581
  7. Terebova S.V. Innovative infrastructure in the region: problems and directions of development. Economic and social changes: facts, trends, forecast, 2014, no. 6(36), pp. 199-212. (In Russian). DOI: 10.15838/esc/2014.6.36.15   
  8. Khomenko V.V., Ruzhnikov E.A. Investment drivers of the country’s economic development. Omsk Scientific Bulletin. Series Society. Story. Modernity, 2019, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 144-152. (In Russian). DOI: 10.25206/2542-0488-2019-4-3-144-152
  9. Tsygankova E.M. Government procurement of innovative products in Russia. Journal of Economic Regulation, 2018, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 134-145. (In Russian). DOI: 10.17835/2078-5429.2018.9.4.134-145
  10. Shmeleva L.A. Instruments for supporting the innovative activity of industrial enterprises in modern Russia. Management of economic systems: electronic scientific journal, 2014, no. 12(72), pp. 33. (In Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22843444
  11. Shuvalov S.S. Modern trends in the development of the public procurement system to stimulate innovative renewal of the economy. ETAP: economic theory, analysis, practice, 2015, no. 1, pp. 74-87. (In Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23310014
  12. Adedeji S.O., Campbell O. The Role of Higher Education in Human Capital Development. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2013. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2380878
  13. Andrews D., Criscuolo C., Gal P. The Best versus the Rest: The Global Productivity Slowdown, Divergence across Firms and the Role of Public Policy. OECD Productivity Working Papers. Paris, OECD Publ., 2016. no. 5. DOI: 10.1787/63629cc9-en
  14. Aubert J.E. Promoting Innovation in Developing Countries: A Conceptual Framework. Washington, World Bank Publ., 2004. DOI: 10.1596/1813-9450-3554
  15. Dirk P., Chiara C. The future of productivity. Policy Quarterly, 2018, vol. 14. (3) DOI: https://doi.org/10.26686/pq.v14i3.5081
  16. Ilina I.E. The effectiveness of tax incentives for business r&d in Russia and abroad. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 2015, vol. 6, no. 3. pp. 331-335. DOI: 10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n3p331
  17. Kakatkar C., Bilgram V., Füller J. Innovation Analytics: Leveraging Artificial Intelligence in the Innovation Process. Business Horizons, Elsevier, 2020, vol. 63(2), pp. 171-181. DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2019.10.006
  18. Khaira R., Khaira A. The influence of education and experience toward investment decision with moderated by financial literacy. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 2016, vol.14, pp. 51-60.  DOI: 10.17512/pjms.2016.14.2.05
  19. Kotsemir M., Meissner D., Conceptualizing the Innovation Process – Trends and Outlook. Higher School of Economics Research Paper, 2013, no. WP BPR 10/STI/2013. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2249782
  20. Kuznetsova T., Sipailo L. State system of stimulation .and regulation of innovative activities of enterprises in developed countries of the world. International Journal of New Economics and Social Sciences, 2017, vol. 6 (2), pp. 232-241. DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0010.7638
  21. McGowan M., Andrews D. The Walkind Dead? Zombie Firms and Productivity Performance in OECD Countries. Economic Policy, 2018, vol. 33(96), pp. 685–736. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/epolic/eiy012
  22. Tohidi H. Patterns of innovation development process. Procedia Information Technology, 2012, vol.1, pp. 371-376. DOI: 10.1016/j.protcy.2012.02.125
  23. The Innovation Imperative: Contributing to Productivity, Growth and Well-Being.  Paris, OECD Publ., 2015. 268 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264239814-en

For citation:

Degtyareva I.V., Barkova E.E. Measures to support the balanced development of innovative and investment processes (by the example of developed and developing countries). CITISE, 2022, no. 2, pp.569-580. DOI: http://doi.org/10.15350/2409-7616.2022.2.49