DOI: http://doi.org/10.15350/2409-7616.2021.1.40

UDC 37.013

Eloev A.A.¹ (Vladikavkaz, Russian Federation) – E-mail: kesaevz@bk.ru, Kesaeva Z.E.¹ (Vladikavkaz, Russian Federation) – E-mail: kesaevz@bk.ru

¹North Ossetian State University named after K.L. Khetagurov

Abstract. The transformation of the Russian social space to a radically new socio-economic format of life inevitably entailed profound innovation processes in all state structures. In this regard, an important socio-cultural role is played by psychological and pedagogical studies devoted to the specifics of using the educational potential of youth policy in the development of socio-cultural institutions, which together represent one of the most important socially significant structures of the state. From a psychological and pedagogical point of view, at the stage of functioning in a market economy, youth policy undergoes significant modifications in its structure, priorities, dominants, which actualizes the need to use the pedagogical potential of sociocultural institutions to improve youth policy. Young people cannot easily fit into the modern socio-economic and political structures of the state, as a result of which a change in social beliefs and attitudes of young people is carried out, and this, in turn, often leads to the need to rethink the activities of socio-cultural institutions: education, culture, sports, economy and other vital areas. The most important function of socio-cultural institutions today is the creation of conditions for the formation of a creative person who is responsible for his actions and deeds, capable of self-regulation, self-education and self-education. The article substantiates the thesis that the joint activity of socio-cultural institutions to solve global problems of socialization of the young generation, their involvement in political, socio-cultural and other problems of the state level is based, first of all, on the interaction and complementarity of various social institutions to achieve common goals and results … The transformation of the Russian social space to a radically new socio-economic format of life inevitably entailed profound innovation processes in all state structures. In this regard, an important socio-cultural role is played by psychological and pedagogical studies devoted to the specifics of using the educational potential of youth policy in the development of socio-cultural institutions, which together represent one of the most important socially significant structures of the state. From a psychological and pedagogical point of view, at the stage of functioning in a market economy, youth policy undergoes significant modifications in its structure, priorities, dominants, which actualizes the need to use the pedagogical potential of sociocultural institutions to improve youth policy. Young people cannot easily fit into the modern socio-economic and political structures of the state, as a result of which a change in social beliefs and attitudes of young people is carried out, and this, in turn, often leads to the need to rethink the activities of socio-cultural institutions: education, culture, sports, economy and other vital areas. The most important function of socio-cultural institutions today is the creation of conditions for the formation of a creative person who is responsible for his actions and deeds, capable of self-regulation, self-education and self-education. The article substantiates the thesis that the joint activity of socio-cultural institutions to solve global problems of socialization of the young generation, their involvement in political, socio-cultural and other problems of the state level is based, first of all, on the interaction and complementarity of various social institutions to achieve common goals and results.

Keywords: youth policy, sociocultural institutions, activities of sociocultural institutions, educational potential of youth policy, strategic directions of youth policy.

References:

1. Andreev A.I., Ilyin I.V. State youth policy of the Russian Federation: strategic guidelines for development. Alma mater (Bulletin of the higher school), 2016, no. 5, pp. 49-53. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/query_results.asp
2. Berezutskiy Yu.V., Baykov N.M. State youth policy and its role in social development. State service, 2020, vol. 22, no. 5 (127), pp. 12-18. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44672218
3. Belyaev G.Yu., Belyaeva A.V. Development of social practices of interaction between educational organizations and institutions with youth associations. Facets of Knowledge. 2013, no. 4 (24), pp. 9-18. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20273753
4. Goldin P.F. Education as a strategic priority in the system of spiritual security in modern Russia. Culture: management, economics, law, 2018, no. 3, pp. 10-15. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35421143
5. Dzhunusova A.S., Byulegenova B.B. State youth policy in the period of modernization of society. Actual scientific research in the modern world, 2019, no. 12-3 (56), pp. 66-73. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42550802
6. Elishev S.O. Value orientations of modern Russian youth and youth policy in the Russian Federation. Annual Theological Conference of the Orthodox St. Tikhon University for the Humanities, 2014, no. 24, pp. 338-342. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22845164
7. Eloev A.A. Socio-pedagogical support of work with youth in the Republic of North Ossetia-Alania. CITISE, 2020, no. 3 (25), pp. 132-139. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44064969
8. Law of the Republic of North Ossetia-Alania “On the strategy of socio-economic development of the Republic of North Ossetia-Alania until 2030”. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/regbase/cgi/online.cgi?base  (15 February 2021)
9. Bitarti Z.A. The concept of development of the Ossetian national culture. Bulletin of the Vladikavkaz Scientific Center. 2010, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 53-61. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18783041
10. Kasatkina E.A., Artykov S.T. Youth policy as an object of state and municipal management. Bulletin of the Udmurt University. Series Economics and Law, 2020, vol. 30,  no. 2, pp. 200-207. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42786502
11. Kosheleva A.V. Youth policy as a priority of cultural policy in the era of globalization. Bulletin of sports history, 2016, no. 2 (4), pp. 41-45. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25828612
12. Kuprin A.A., Buga A.V. Strategic guidelines for the formation and implementation of state youth policy. Economy and management of the national economy (St. Petersburg), 2020, no. 10 (12), pp. 20-27. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42552681
13. Polunina L.I., Bauder G.A., Tatarintsev E.O. Topical issues of spiritual education of youth. Scientific Almanac, 2016, no. 10-2 (24), pp. 164-167. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=27518151
14. Savina N.G. Self-regulation of behavior as a social characteristic of personality. Culture and education: from theory to practice, 2015, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 302-306. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23372623
15. Shamsutdinova D.V. Competence-based approach to the formation of the social and cultural space of the university. Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State Academy of Culture and Arts, 2012, no. 1 (29), pp. 151-154. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17749822
16. Yakushkina M.S. Interaction of socio-cultural institutions as a mechanism for the development of educational space. Man and education, 2011, no. 1 (26), pp. 34-38. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=16225825

For citation:

Eloev A.A., Kesaeva Z.E. Educational potential of youth policy in the area of development of sociocultural institutions. CITISE, 2021, no. 1, pp.447-453. DOI:http://doi.org/10.15350/2409-7616.2021.1.40