DOI: http://doi.org/10.15350/24097616.2019.5.32

Elena V. Plashchevaya – Cand. Sc. Education, Associate professor of a medical physics department of Amur State Medical Academy, Blagoveshchensk, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5492-037X, E-mail: elena-plashhevaja@rambler.ru

Olga V. Ivanchuk – Doctor of Education, assistant professor, Head of chair of physics, mathematics and medical informatics Federal State Budgetary Institution of Higher Education Astrakhan State Medical University, Astrakhan, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1614-7483, E-mail: olgaiva.2401@gmail.com

Abstract. It is known that the content of the studied disciplines including physics isn’t regulated by federal state standards of higher medical education. Having generalized the experience of pedagogical science and teaching training in developing the content of academic disciplines, the authors of the given article came to a conclusion that the problem of forming the content of physics course in a medical university remains unsolved: there is no unity of opinion among the teaching staff on the subject presentation of teaching material, on the depth of studying physics by future doctors. It is separately noted that the content of physics course in medical universities is as a rule the same for different majors. The revealed problems are solved by the authors of the article in the framework of implementing the principle of fundamentality of education and the professional orientation principle, competence and activity approaches. Thus, the combination of these didactic principles ensures the interconnection of the fundamental and professional component of training, and the implementation of the selected approaches will allow taking into account the specifics of future professional activity. Applying this theoretical basis, a mechanism (technique) was developed for the formation of the content of educational material in the form of a system of actions, guided by which the content of physics course for students of medical universities can be identified taking into account their future professional activity. The given mechanism was used to develop the content of physics course for future dentists and was tested in a number of Russian medical universities, receiving a positive evaluation from the teaching staff faculty of specialized departments. To confirm the objectivity of the evaluation, the authors of the study used the method of expert assessments, the results of which proved the effectiveness of the proposed system of actions for developing the content of physics course in a medical university.

Keywords: teaching physics to future doctors, the content of physics course in a medical university.

References:

1. Remizov A.N. Medical physics and biophysicsб 2012, 648 pp. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=19460697
2. Vladimirov Yu. A., Roshchyupkin D.I., Potapenko A.Ya., Deev I. Biophysics. Moscow, Meditsin Publ., 1983, 272 p. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25829475
3. Gubanov N.I., Utepbergenova A.A. Medical biophysics. Tyumen State University Publ., 1978, 336 p. URL:https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26047877
4. Fedorova V.N., Stepanova L.A.Short course of medical and biological physics with elements of recreation therapy. Moscow. FIZMALIT Publ., 2005, 624 p. URL:https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24063516
5. Makarova N.S. Transformation of high school didactics. Moscow, Flinta Publ, 2012, 180 p. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20241819
6. Kolomin V.I. Fundamental training in physics as a basis of forming professional competency of future physics teachers. Volgograd, 2010, 45 p. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=19246660
7. Balakhonov A.V. Fundamentalization of higher medical education based on the system of natural science knowledge. Saint Petersburg, 2007, 42 p. URL:https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=15850026
8. Duda G. Introduction to the Wilhelm von Humboldt Memorandum “On internal and external organization of Berlin universities”. University administration, 1998, no. 3, pp. 24–27. URL:https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=9208635
9. Tulintsev A.E. Education fundamentalization based on the principle of scientific relevance. Science and school, 2012, no. 1, pp. 20-23. URL:https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17719237
10. I. Petrova. Interdisciplinarity of university education as a contemporary form of its fundamentality. Messenger of Tomsk State University. Philosophy. Sociology. Politology, 2008, no. 3 (4), pp.7-13. URL:https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=12499834
11. Mirzabekova O.V. Distant physics teaching in the system of training future engineers to professional activity. Moscow, Moscow pedagogical state university Publ., 2010, 355 p. . URL:https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=19231873
12. Shaikhutdinova G.A., Mukhametzyanova F.Sh. Study guide, Kazan, Danis Publ., 2014, 234 p. URL:https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26794331

For citation:
Plashchevaya E. V. , Ivanchuk O.V.  Theoretical principles of developing a physics course in a medical university. CITISE, 2019, no. 5, pp. 354-362. DOI: http://doi.org/10.15350/24097616.019.5.32