UDC 378.1

Sorokina A.S.¹ (Khimki, Russian Federation) – mail_alex95@mail.ru

¹Civil Defense Academy of the Ministry of the Russian Federation for Civil Defense, Emergencies, and Elimination of Consequences of Natural Disasters named after Lieutenant General D.I. Mikhailik

Abstract. This article is devoted to the definition of the essence and features of the university training of a future specialist in the field of occupational safety. The relevance of the research topic is due to the rapid development of science and technology, the transformation of economic and business processes, resulting in fundamentally new jobs, professions and types of production activities. All these innovations from the point of view of occupational safety can carry new dangerous and harmful factors, which is a problematic field of occupational safety and university training of future specialists in this field. The results of the study are presented, which include the definition of university training based on the analysis and synthesis of modern scientific domestic and foreign sources (a process aimed at the formation of professional knowledge, skills, competencies, value bases, professionally significant personal qualities and readiness for future professional activity in a future specialist). The structural components of the university training process (targeted, substantive, organizational-activity, diagnostic-effective), their boundaries and interrelationships are determined. Based on the analysis of scientific sources and the regulatory framework, the content of the components of the university training of a future specialist in the field of occupational safety is determined, justified through such approaches as systemic, competence-based, activity-based and personality-oriented. The definition of university training of a specialist in the field of occupational safety is given (a process aimed at forming a student’s system of competencies, professionally significant knowledge, skills, personal qualities, occupational safety values and readiness to perform labor functions to ensure the functioning of the occupational safety management system, prevent occupational accidents and diseases, reduce exposure to harmful and dangerous production factors and occupational risk management). The results obtained will be used for further research on this topic.

Keywords: university training, professional training, occupational safety, occupational safety specialist, technosphere safety.

References:

1. Abiltarova, E. N. (2018). Principles of developing a culture of professional safety in future occupational safety specialists. Pedagogical Education in Russia, 10, 76–84. (In Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/ymscix
2. Bakiko, E. V. (2022). Assessment of professional competence of occupational safety specialists using the express diagnostics method. Bulletin of the Scientific Center, 4, 38–46. (In Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/wnemdg
3. Belgrai, N. V., & Korneeva, A. N. (2023). Features of the content of the discipline “Occupational safety in the industry” for students studying in the field of training 44.04.04 “Vocational training (by industry)”. Domestic and Foreign Pedagogics, 1(3), 106–119. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.24412/2224-0772-2023-93-106-119
4. Berseneva, M. A. (2021). Features of the training of future architects in the context of higher education. Problems of Modern Pedagogical Education, 71‑1, 41–44. (In Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/inczcb
5. Gadzhieva, N. M. (2016). Features of university training of future psychologists as a process of specially organized development of their personality. Bulletin of the Academy of Law and Management, 3, 193–197. (In Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/wroblt
6. Garashkina, N. V. (2004). Didactic design of training social work specialists in a university (Doctoral dissertation). Tambov. (In Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/nnibld
7. Ippolitova, N. V., & Gordievsky, V. M. (2024). The essence and structure of the process of professional training of a future programmer. Bulletin of Shadrinsk State Pedagogical University, 3, 193–199. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.52772/25420291_2024_3_193
8. Kazinets, V. A., & Trinadtsatko, O. A. (2025). Training of teaching staff in a university setting as a component of social order. CITISE, 1, 224–236. (In Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/nyskia
9. Lang, P. P. (2024). Using the case method in the educational process of teaching legal disciplines in educational organizations and institutions of higher education. Concept, 6, 139–150. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.24412/2304-120X-2024-11087
10. Maistrenko, E. V., Ibragimova, N. I., Andreeva, T. S., & Maistrenko, V. I. (2018). Features of motivation of students — future occupational safety specialists. Higher Education Today, 12, 68–70. https://doi.org/10.25586/RNU.HET.18.12.P.68
11. Makovchik, A. V. (2024). Methodology of historical and pedagogical study of the genesis of the pedagogical system. Bulletin of Karaganda University. Series: Pedagogy, 29(2), 94–103. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31489/2024ped2/94-103
12. Morozova, A. L., & Kostyukova, T. A. (2019). Pedagogical system of language education in the conditions of a non-linguistic university. Language and Culture, 48, 315–331. (In Russian).  https://doi.org/10.17223/19996195/48/20
13. Mukazhanova, E. T., & Abaeva, G. A. (2025). Training future special educators to work with children with complex disabilities. Bulletin of KazUMOiWL named after Ablai Khan. Series “Pedagogical Sciences”, 1, 326–338. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.48371/PEDS.2025.76.1.021
14. Ostapenko, A. A. (2013). Theory of N. V. Kuzmina’s pedagogical system: Genesis and consequences. South‑Russian Journal of Social Sciences, 4, 37–52. (In Russian). https://elibrary.ru/ruazkh
15. Pozdeeva, S. N., & Zaychikova, I. V. (2024). University training of IT specialists in modern conditions. Bulletin of the Baikal State University, 34(1), 71–77. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17150/2500-2759.2024.34(1).71-77
16. Ptitsyna, E. V., & Talykh, A. A. (2022). Professional training of future technology teachers: A cultural aspect. Problems of Modern Pedagogical Education, 75‑1, 125–128. (In Russian). https://elibrary.ru/nonflk
17. Rezer, T. M., & Cao, Sh. (2025). Professional training of Russian language teachers for Chinese universities: Historical, pedagogical and social aspects. CITISE, 1, 86–102. (In Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/rrrhmk
18. Ruzimurodov, F., & Olimzhonova, F. (2025). The role and significance of pedagogical practice in the professional training of future teachers. Central Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Management Studies, 2(11, Part 2), 42–46. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17668147
19. Xie, X. (2024). The essence and structure of training future teachers to form functional literacy of primary school students. Vesti BDPU. Ser. 1. Pedagogy. Psychology. Philology, (1), 30–33. (In Russian). http://elib.bspu.by/handle/doc/62837
20. Skryabina, A. G., & Stepanova, L. V. (2025). Pedagogical support for the professional training of future teachers in the context of industrial practice. International Research Journal, 7. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.60797/IRJ.2025.157.44
21. Usikova, O. V., & Osennova, E. V. (2023). Problems of practical application of the new rules for labor protection training. Labor Safety and Health, 3, 27–31. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.54904/52952_2023_3_27

For citation: Sorokina, A. S. (2026). University training of future occupational safety specialists: Essence and characteristics. CITISE, 3, 220–236. (In Russian).