UDC 378

Borodina A.N.¹ (Lugansk, Russian Federation) – borodina2205@bk.ru

¹Lugansk State Pedagogical University

Abstract. Digital transformation of education is driven by the development of distance learning and the integration of specific interactive tools into the educational process, contributing to the formation of new personal and professional qualities among students that are relevant to modern society. In this regard, metacompetency serves as a fundamental component of professional training for future foreign language teachers, ensuring proficiency in digital tools, intercultural communication, and linguodidactic skills. The aim of the article is to identify and theoretically substantiate the methodological foundations of forming the metacompetency of future foreign language teachers using distance learning tools. The novelty of the study lies in identifying the potential of competency-based, meta-disciplinary, personality-activity, and informational approaches for effectively forming future foreign language teachers’ metacompetency in the context of education digitalization. Based on an analysis of researchers’ positions, the author’s definition of future foreign language teachers’ metacompetency is proposed. The methodological approaches presented by the author contribute to achieving the goal of the methodological research of this scientific phenomenon. Special attention is paid to substantiating the principles used to implement the above listed methodological approaches. The author concludes that the identified methodological approaches and principles form the basis for developing pedagogical conditions, diagnostics, and methodological support for the process of forming future foreign language teachers’ metacompetency through distance learning tools.

Keywords: methodological approach, future foreign language teachers’ metacompetency, competency-based approach, meta-disciplinary approach, personal-activity approach, informational approach.

References:

1. Aksenova I.N. Methodological model for teaching students various types of foreign language communicative activities based on dictogloss. Bulletin of Tambov University. Series: Humanities, 2023, vol. 28, no. 4. pp. 880–896. (In Russian). DOI: 10.20310/1810-0201-2023-28-4-880-896
2. Alimsakaeva R.K., Aibazova M.Yu., Karasova A.A. Metapredmetal approach to training as a factor in the professionalization of university graduates. Pedagogical Journal, 2022, vol. 12, no. 1–1, pp. 293–302. (In Russian). DOI: 10.34670/AR.2022.33.54.016
3. Belkina A.P. Metadisciplinary approach to teaching a foreign language for special purposes. Proc. “International Scientific and Practical Full-time and Correspondence Conference”. Orekhovo-Zuevo, State Humanitarian and Technological University Publ., 2022. pp. 13–20. (In Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/zpuzmw
4. Borodina A.N. Future foreign languages teachers’ metacompetency ​ in the context of a competency-based approach. Proc. “IV International Scientific and Practical Conference”. Donetsk, Donetsk State University Publ., 2025. pp. 228–235. (In Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/tavgei
5. Borodina A.N., Kharchenko L.I. Pedagogical conditions for the formation of future foreign languages teachers’ metacompetency by the means of distance learning tools. Values and meanings, 2024, no. 2 (90), pp. 113–124. (In Russian). DOI:10.24412/2071-6427-2024-2-113-124
6. Koknova TA. Features of student-centered training of philology students. Bulletin of Lugansk State Pedagogical University. Pedagogical Sciences Series. Education, 2025, no. 1 (124), pp. 48–55. (In Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/juthba
7. Colin K.K. Informational Approach in the Methodology of Cognition. Strategic Priorities, 2018, no. 1(17). pp. 94–111. (In Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/yvoylv
8. Krishtop A.N., Grebennikov V.M., Nikitin N.I. et al. Methodological approaches to the process of forming professional metacompetency of future teachers at the university. CITISE, 2023, no. 4(38), pp. 96–107. (In Russian). DOI: 10.15350/2409-7616.2023.4.09
9. Nadolinskaya T.V., Rossinskaya S.A. Essential characteristics and structure of meta-competence of a teacher in the context of integrated media education. Modern Problems of Science and Education, 2020, no. 2, P. 68. (In Russian). DOI: 10.17513/spno.29730
10. Abakumov I.V., Alekhina S.V., Andryushkova O.V. et al.  Pedagogical education in modern Russia: strategic guidelines for development. Rostov-on-Don, Southern Federal University Publ., 2020. 612 p. (In Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/vslltj 
11. Pesotskaya S.A. Information and communication approach to teaching at a university as a requirement of the time (based on the course “Modern Foreign Literature”). Izvestia of Tomsk Polytechnic University, 2006, vol.  309, no. 3, pp. 221–226. (In Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/hysmwv
12. Savina N.V. Methodological foundations of personalization of education. Science of Man: Humanitarian Research, 2020, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 82–90. (In Russian). DOI: 10.17238/issn1998-5320.2020.14.4.10
13. Sizova E.V. Didactic possibilities of metadisciplinary approach in foreign language teaching in higher education. Scientific Review. Pedagogical Sciences, 2020, no. 3, pp. 48–52. (In Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/beznow
14. Sizova E.V. Foreign language teacher’s meta-competence development in the context of implementation of the federal university educational standard. Philological Sciences. Questions of Theory and Practice, 2018, no. 2–1, pp. 202–205. (In Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/yodntj
15. Turyanskaya O.F. Theoretical foundations of a personality-oriented approach to learning. Moscow, National Research Publ., 2023. 268 p. (In Russian). DOI: 10.25726/v9855-2416-5919-n
16. Khokhlenkova L.A. Implementation of activity-based approach ideas in higher education. Baltic Humanitarian Journal, 2021, vol. 10, no. 2 (35), pp. 191–193. DOI: 10.26140/bgz3-2021-1002-0051
17. Shershneva V.A., Osipov M.V. Metacompetency in the hierarchy of competencies. Bulletin of the Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University named after V.P. Astafiev, 2020, no. 1(51), pp. 80–89. (In Russian). DOI:  10.25146/1995-0861-2020-51-1-186
18. Brown B.R. Meta-Competence: A Recipe for Reframing the Competence Debate. Personnel Review. London, ASC Publ., 1993. pp. 25–32. URL: 10.1108/EUM0000000000814
19. Le Deist F.D., Winterton J. What Is Competence? Human Resource Development International, 2005, no. 8(1), pp. 27–46. URL: 10.1080/1367886042000338227
20. Potts M., Le Hunt B.  Reframing resilience as a systemic issue: Meta competencies that transform individuals and learning ecologies. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 2024, no. 41(5), pp. 750–760. DOI:10.1002/sres.3052
21. Treve M. Comparative analysis of teacher-centered and student-centered learning in the context of higher education: A co-word analysis. Iberoamerican Journal of Science Measurement and Communication, 2024, no 4(2), pp. 1–12. DOI:10.47909/ijsmc.117

For citation: Borodina A.N. Methodological bases of forming future foreign language teachers’ metacompetency through distance learning tools. CITISE, 2025, no. 3, pp. 830-839.