CITISE
ISSN 2409-7616
CITISE № 4(26) 2020
Economic sciences
Downloads

O. Komarova

FEATURES OF STATE SUPPORT FOR MICROBUSINESS

DOI: http://doi.org/10.15350/2409-7616.2020.4.47

OxanaV. Komarova –Candidate of economic sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Economic Theory and Corporate Governance, Ural State University of Economics, Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation, ORCID ID:  0000-0001-6145-2631, E-mail: okkomarova@yandex.ru

Abstract. Microbusiness is the largest small and medium-sized business sector. However, the approaches to the analysis of microbusiness that have developed in the scientific literature do not allow the formation of an effective model of its state support. The purpose of the study is to identify areas of state support for this sector at the present stage on the basis of an analysis of the characteristics of microbusiness. The study is based on the use of methods for reviewing scientific literature on the development and nature of microbusiness, small business and problems of state support, and statistical methods are used in the study to give an idea of the development of microbusiness in the Russian economy. The article first examines the indicators of microbusiness development in Russia, defines its role in the national economy, then carries out a conceptual analysis of the model of state support for microbusiness. Analysis of the literature made it possible to single out the essential features of microbusiness, which include: based on close, family ties, self-reliance and resources, multifunctionality and flexibility of the internal structure, focus on income, rather than on business growth. Based on the analysis of the peculiarities of microbusiness, the directions of its state support focused on expanding the microbusiness sector were identified: the development of entrepreneurial education, inter-firm cooperation, business incubators and accelerators, the formation of tax conditions and the development of digital services for entrepreneurs. Further research into the issues of state support for microbusiness should be based on the institutional concept, the concept of network interactions and the development of social capital. The scientific novelty of the research lies in the development of specific support mechanisms for micro-enterprises. The theoretical and practical significance of the work lies in the fact that the theoretical analysis of the essence of microbusiness allows us to develop practical recommendations for the formation of a model of state support for this sector.

Keywords: small business, microbusiness, microenterprises, government support, inter-firm interaction.

References:

  1. Antonova M.P., Barinova V.A., Gromov V.V., Zemtsov S.P. Development of small and medium-sized businesses in Russia in the context of the implementation of the national projectю. Moscow, Delo Publ., 2020,  88 p. (In Russian)
  2. Baitursunov A.A. Institutional framework of the incentive system for small and mediumsized enterprises in the republic of Kazakhstan. MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research), 2018,vol.9, issue 3, pp.475–490. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2018.9.3.475-490
  3. Bukhtiyarova T.I., Dubynina A.V. Forming a model of infrastructural support of small and medium business. Society and power, 2016, no. 3 (59), pp. 73-79. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2018.9.3.475-490
  4. Dabbus T. Financial mechanism of development of microentrepreneurship. University Bulletin, 2017, no. 3, pp. 105-112. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28961661
  5. Ershova I.V. Microenterprise: “micro” does not mean “small”. Business law, 2018, no. 2, pp. 11-18. (In Russian) URL:https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=34941666
  6. Zhuk A.A., Potii K.M. Family business phenomenon in the modern economic theory. Russian entrepreneurship, 2017, vol.18, issue 19, pp. 2891-2908. (In Russian) DOI: 10.18334/rp.18.19.38321
  7. Ibragimova G.I. Essence and role of microbusiness. social function of microentities. Bulletin of the Udmurt University. Series “Economics and Law”, 2014, no. 4, pp.50-55. (In Russian)  URL:https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22951581
  8. Klyuev, A.K. Bagirova, A.P. Yashin, A.A. Zabokritskaya, L.D. Entrepreneurial education in Russian universities: scope, types of programs, balance of competences.Journal of Modern Competition, 2017, vol. 11, № 1(61), pp. 6-20. (In Russian) URL:https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29073931
  9. Komarova O.V. Institute for State Support of Small Business and Problems of Its Development in Russia. Yekaterinburg, Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University Publ., 2007. 128 p. (In Russian) URL:https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25913172
  10. Komarova O.V., Denisova A.E., Belan A.A., Loskutnikov E.A. The Main Directions of Social Media Development. Russian Journal of Economic Theory,  2020, vol.17, no. 2, pp. 497-502. (In Russian) DOI:https://doi.org/10.31063/2073-6517/2020.17-2.21
  11. Koren’ A.V., KraubergerZh.Yu. Formation and development prospects of an effective tax policy in the field of taxation of microbusiness. Journal of Economy and entrepreneurship, 2014, no. 12-2, pp. 78-80. (In Russian) URL:https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22888293
  12. Kremin A.E., Gulin K.A. Managing the functioning of small business at the municipal level as a driver of regional economic development. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 2017, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 94-110. (In Russian) DOI: 10.15838/esc/2017.4.52.5
  13. Luk’yanova A.V. Trends and Opportunities for Digitalization of Small and Medium Business. Eurasian Scientific Association, 2019, no. 6-4 (52), pp. 246-251. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=38585779
  14. Burov V.Yu. Ensuring competitiveness and efficiency. State support and economic security. Monograph. Chita, Transbaikal State University, 2017, 236 p. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29709393
  15. Mokina M. I. Factors of family business growth in Russia: literature review and future research directions. Strategic Decisions and Risk Management, 2019, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 88–97. (In Russian) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17747/2618-947X-2019-1-88-97
  16. Mukhina I.V. The problems of loan provision to micro-entrepreneurship entities in Russia. Russian entrepreneurship, 2015,vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 563-568. (In Russian) DOI: 10.18334/rp.16.4.91
  17. Polyanin A.V., Soboleva Yu.P., Tarnovskii V.V. Digitalization of Processes of Small and Average Business. Administrative consulting, 2020, no. 4 (136), pp.80-96. (In Russian) . DOI: 10.22394/1726-1139-2020-4-80-96
  18. Popov E.V., Semyachkov K.A., Simonova V.L. Modelling of conditions of development of network structures. Bulletin of Ural Federal University. Series Economics and Managemen, 2016, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 324-341. (In Russian) DOI: 10.15826/vestnik.2016.15.3.017
  19. Serova L.S., Strakhovich E.V., ChurakovaI.Yu. Multi-Sided Platforms in the Evolution of Micro-Enterprise Business Models. Manager, 2017, no. 4 (68), pp.53-60. (In Russian) URL:https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30611974
  20. Serova L.S., ChurakovaI.Yu. Role of microenterprises in innovation development of Russian sub-regions. Innovation, 2017, no. 4 (222), pp. 79-88. (In Russian) URL:https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29229390
  21. Ustinova N.G. Digital economy and entrepreneurship: problems of interaction. Bulletin of the Saratov State Social and Economic University, 2019, no, 3(77), pp.32-37. (In Russian) URL:https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=39247551
  22. Casals F.E. The SME Co-operation Framework: A Multi-Method Secondary Research Approach to SME Collaboration. IPEDR,  2011, vol. 3, pp. 118–124.
  23. Gherhes C., Williams N., Vorley T., Vasconcelos A.C. Distinguishing micro-businesses from SMEs: a systematic review of growth constraints. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 2016,vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 939-963.  DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-05-2016-0075
  24. Hausberg J.,Korreck S. Business incubators and accelerators: a co-citation analysis-based, systematic literature review. Journal of Technology Transfer, 2018, pp.1-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9651-y
  25. Krupinova E. Microenterprises as an object of accounting. Vestnik of Kazan State Agrarian University,2016,№ 11,pp. 100-106. DOI:10.12737/22684
  26. Lateh M., Hussain M.D., Halim M.S.Ab. Micro Enterprise Development and Income Sustainability for Poverty Reduction: A Literature Investigation. International Journal of Business and Technopreneurship, 2017, vol. 7, no.1, pp.23-38.
  27. Lotchi K., Kwegyir-Afful E., Zafar A., Sivula A., Kantola J. Intermediary Organization and Collaboration Platform for SMEs. In: Kantola J., Nazir S. (eds) Advances in Human Factors, Business Management and Leadership. AHFE 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Springer, Cham, 2020, vol. 961. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20154-8_11
  28. Maksum I.R., Rahayu A.Y.S., Kusumawardhani D. A Social Enterprise Approach to Empowering Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in Indonesia. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 2020, vol. 6, pp.50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6030050
  29. Peters R., Naicker V. Small medium micro enterprise business goals and government support: A South African case study. South African Journal of Business Management, 2013,vol. 44(4), pp. 13-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v44i4.165
  30. Raza A.,Muffatto M., Saeed S.The influence of formal institutions on the relationship between entrepreneurial readiness and entrepreneurial behavior: a cross-country analysis. Journal of small business and enterprise development, 2019, vol. 26 (1), pp. 133-157. DOI: 10.1108/JSBED-01-2018-0014


For citation:

Komarova O.V. Features of state support for microbusiness. CITISE, 2020, no. 4, pp.538-551. DOI:http://doi.org/10.15350/2409-7616.2020.4.47

ЦИТИСЭ © 2025
ЭЛ № ФС 77 - 59069 / ISSN 2409-7616