ISSN 2409-7616

T. Skryl


Tatiana V. Skryl – PhD, associate professor  Economic theory department Plekhanov Russian University of Economics (Russia, Moscow), SPIN-code: 4124-8507 E-mail:

Abstract. The article discusses the uneven development of the economy and, in particular, related to the different approaches to decision-making at the state level. The current situation places the state in a field of limited rationality due to internal and external factors. Due to the fact that the Russian specifics of economic development depends on a particular region, the author considers to analyze the procedure for choosing the right solution in the field of the main tasks and priorities of economic policy. The purpose of the study is to identify the strategy of decision-making depending on the volume and complexity of the available tools. The main objectives of the study – the author offers a choice of the specification of the choice of economic policy in the context of the current situation in the Russian economy, depending on the territorial potential. The author provides for the analysis a number of existing problems that limit the potential choice. Finally, to unlock the potential of each region, several types of economic policy implementation are proposed.

Keywords: decision-making, regional potential, state, sanctions, limited rationality, territorial development.



  1. Bogoviz A.V., Osipov V.S., Chistyakova M.K., Borisov M.Y. Comparative Analysis Of Formation Of Industry 0 In Developed And Developing Countries // Studies in Systems, Decision and Control. 2019. T. 169. S. 155-164.
  2. Coase R., 2006. The Conduct of Economics: The Example of Fisher Body and General Motors. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy. No 15 (2): 255–278
  3. Favero N., Meier K.J., O’Toole L.J. Goals, Trust, Participation, and Feedback: Linking Internal Management with Performance Outcomes (2016) Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26 (2), pp. 327-343.
  4. Grimmelikhuijsen S.G., Meijer, A.J. Effects of transparency on the perceived trustworthiness of a government organization: Evidence from an online experiment (2014) Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24 (1), pp. 137-157.
  5. Henry A.D., Lubell M., Mccoy M. Survey-Based Measurement of Public Management and Policy Networks (2012) Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 31 (2), pp. 432-452
  6. Herbert A. Simon. Rationality as Process and as Product of Thought. Richard T. Ely Lecture // American Economic Review, May 1978, v.68, no.2, p.1–16.
  7. Hood C. What happens when transparency meets blame-avoidance? (2007) Public Management Review, 9 (2), pp. 191-210.
  8. Porter M. E., 2008, On Competition. Updated and Expanded Ed. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing
  9. Reinert E.S., 2007. How Rich Countries Got Rich and Why Poor Countries Stay Poor. Constable, London
  10. Schultz Walter J., 2001, The Moral Conditions of Economic Efficiency. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press
  11. Ahmadullin R. A., Gilyazutdinova I. V., Gilyazova A. A., Taishev F. R.. Transformaciya sistemy gosudarstvennogo upravleniya innovacionnym razvitiem promyshlennyh predpriyatij v regionah // Vestnik kazanskogo tekhnologicheskogo universiteta. 2012. №15 (1). s. 226-230
  12. Gureeva Е.A. Vliyanie sportivnyh sobytij na formirovanie imidzha i brenda regiona. V knige: Problemy i perspektivy industrii gostepriimstva, turizma i sporta sbornik statej. Rossijskij Ekonomicheskij universitet imeni G.V. Plekhanova. Ufa, 2018. S. 26-29.
  13. Gureeva Е.A. Evolyuciya rynka sportivnyh meropriyatij // Uchenye zapiski Rossijskoj Akademii predprinimatel’stva. 2018. T. 17. № 2. S. 79-82.
  14. Osipov V.S. Problema zanyatosti v cifrovoj ekonomike // CITISE. 2019. № 1 (18). S. 35.
  15. Skryl’ T.V. Innovacionno-tekhnologicheskie tochki rosta kak osnova novoj modeli social’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya RF // Azimut nauchnyh issledovanij: ekonomika i upravlenie. 2017. T. 6. № 2 (19). S. 244-248

Skryl’ T.V., Tutaeva D.R. Ocenka konkurentosposobnosti rossijskoj ekonomiki v usloviyah uzhestocheniya ekonomicheskih sankcij//CITISE. 2019. №