Sergey Mokhnachev – PhD, assistant professor of the Department «Industrial and civil construction», Izhevsk state technical University named after M. T. Kalashnikov, (Russia, Izhevsk), SPIN-код: 2649-5640, e-mail: msa_ufmfpa@mail.ru

Nelli Shamaeva – PhD, assistant professor of the Department «Protection in Emergency Situations and Risk Management», Udmurt State University, (Russia, Izhevsk), SPIN-код: 4292-8054; e-mail: nelli6016@gmail.com

Elena Alexandrova – PhD, assistant professor of the Department «Еconomic analysis and statistics», Izhevsk State Agricultural Academy, (Russia, Izhevsk), SPIN-код: 8928-7417; e-mail: elena19719@rambler.ru

Vyacheslav Sokolov – PhD, assistant professor of the Department «Еconomic analysis and statistics2, Izhevsk State Agricultural Academy, (Russia, Izhevsk), SPIN-код: 8332-8900; e-mail: Slava@kompak18.ru

Abstract. The article deals with the problem of revealing interrelation and regularity of regional innovative development on the basis of conjugate analysis of economic and social processes in the conditions of innovative development. The authors of the article propose to apply a new paradigm of analysis of socio-economic processes in time and in space – socio-Economics to solve the above-mentioned problem. Application of methods of scientific cognition: methods of analysis, synthesis, comparative research, logical analysis, hypotheses, inductive and deductive analysis allowed to reveal the basic interrelation in regional innovative development in modern conditions – regional innovative development should be determined as a complex result of cooperation and development of all components of the innovation system, both in the social space of the region and the economic space of the region, as well as in social and economic time.

Keywords: innovation development, innovation system, region, socio-Economics, technological innovations, technological trajectory, proximity effect, socialization effect.

References:

1. Borodkin F.M. Vzaimodejstvie sociologicheskih i ehkonomicheskih nauk. CHto vperedi? // Sociologicheskie issledovaniya. – – № 12. – S. 113-115.
2. Danilov A.N. Perekhodnoe obshchestvo: problemy sistemnoj transformacii. – Mn.: Harvest, 1998. – 432 s.
3. Kuchko E.E. Sociologiya innovacionnogo razvitiya kak special’naya sociologicheskaya teoriya //Problemy upravleniya. –2009. – № 4 (33). – S. 90-94.
4. Suhih V.A. Socioehkonomika regiona: metodologiya issledovaniya, tendencii razvitiya i mekhanizmy upravleniya. / V.A.Suhih; Perm. gos. un-t. Perm’, 2008. – 264 s.
5. SHabanova M.A. Socioehkonomika: ot paradigmy k novoj nauke // ONS: obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’. – 2006. – №.1. – S. 121-133.
6. SHamaeva N.P. Rol’ nauchno-proizvodstvennoj kooperacii dlya innovacionnogo ehkonomicheskogo rosta // Vestnik UdGU. Seriya EHkonomika i pravo. – 2011. –№ 4. – S. 83-86.
7. Brook J.W., de Bruijn E.J., McDonough E.F. Strategic Reorientation of Industrial R&D Towards Commercial objectives. Organisational Implications for Dynamic Management of Technology Transfer and Innovation Transfer in Global Competitive Business Environments. // http://doc.utwente.nl/73385/1/Brook07strategic.pdf (Дата обращения11.2017).
8. Dosi G. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. Research Policy, No 11, 1982, pp. 147 –162.
9. Dushl M. The patterns of Chinese firm growth: a conditional estimation approach of the asymmetric exponential power density. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2015, vol. 24, issue 3, pages 539-563.
10. Gourevitch P., Bohn R., McKendrick D. Globalization of production: Insights from the Hard Disk Drive Industry // World Development. 2000. Vol. 28. No 2. P. 301-317.
11. Lakhani K.R., Tushman M.L. Open Innovation and Organizational Boundaries: The Impact of Task Decomposition and Knowledge Distribution on the Locus of Innovation. 2012 // http://wwwiadb.org/intal/intalcdi/PE/2012/12235.pdf (Дата обращения 30.11.2017).
12. McKendrick D., Doner R.F., Haggard S. From Silicon Valley to Singapore: Location and Competitive Advantage in the Hard Disk Drive Industry. Stanford University Press, 2000. 351 p.
13. Mody A., Suri R., Tatikonda M. Keeping pace with change: International competition in printed circuit board assembly. Industrial and corporate change. Oxford university press. 1995 //http://home.kelley.iupui.edu/tatikond/webpage/publications/f_keeping.pdf (Дата обращения12.2017).
14. Nelson R.R. The evolution of comparative or competitive advantage: A preliminary report on a study. Industrial and Corporate Change 5, 1996, pp. 597 – 616.
15. Oinas Р., Malecki E.J. The evolution of technology in time and space: from national and regional to spatial innovation systems. International Regional Science Review. 2002. Vol. 25. No 1, pp. 102 –131.
16. Porter M.E. The competitive advantage of nations // https://hbr.org/1990/03/the-competitive-advantage-of-nations (Дата обращения 12.2017).
17. Tushman M., Smith W.K., Wood R.C., Westerman G., O’Reilly C. Organizational Designs and Innovation Streams. Harvard Business School. 2006 // http://www.researchgate.net/publication/227464715_Organization_Designs_and_Innovation_Streams (Дата обращения11.2017).