UDC 378

Milinskiy A.Yu.¹ (Blagoveshchensk, Russian Federation) – a.milinskiy@mail.ru

¹Blagoveshchensk State Pedagogical University

Abstract. This article examines modern scientific and methodological approaches to developing engineering thinking in the teaching of the mechanics section of a general physics course in technical and pedagogical education. The study was conducted as a systematic review of the scientific literature over the past five years. The analysis included peer-reviewed publications, meta-analyses, case studies, regulatory documents, and theoretical studies devoted to engineering education, active pedagogical technologies, and the integration of practice-oriented approaches into student physical training. The article presents a comparative analysis of modern concepts of engineering thinking as a systemic method for interpreting physical processes with a focus on designing technical solutions. Key areas for modernizing the teaching of mechanics are identified: the inclusion of engineering case studies, project- and problem-based learning, laboratory work with an engineering focus, interdisciplinary projects, and the use of digital and virtual educational environments. This article describes pedagogical conditions that facilitate the development of engineering and practical competencies in students, including the ability to model real mechanical systems, account for errors and tolerances, apply the laws of mechanics in project work, and work in a team. An analysis of the evidence base for the effectiveness of active learning methods is conducted, including the results of experimental studies and meta-analyses confirming their positive impact on the level of subject knowledge, motivation, and the development of critical thinking in students. The main limitations to the implementation of engineering-oriented methods are identified: resource, personnel, and organizational barriers, as well as insufficient methodological support for instructors. A conclusion is drawn about the strategic importance of integrating engineering thinking into the mechanics course as a prerequisite for improving the quality of training for future engineering specialists. Prospects for further research related to the development of methodological models for teaching mechanics adapted to the requirements of modern engineering practice are outlined.

Keywords: engineering thinking, mechanics, general physics course, engineering education, project-based learning, problem-based learning, active learning methods, physics education, engineering competencies, interdisciplinary projects, virtual laboratories, educational technologies.

References:  

1. Baryshnikov, S. V. (2024). Introducing students to nanotechnology ideas in physics classes. Educational Physics, 2, 52–57. (In Russian). https://elibrary.ru/gtkvax
2. Baryshnikov, S. V. (2024). On the existence of limiting velocity in mechanics. Physics Education in Universities, 2, 106–111. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.54965/16093143_2024_30_2_106
3. Milinsky, A. Yu. (2022). Problems of supporting research activities in physics for bachelor’s degrees at a university. Science and School, 6, 165–171. (In Russian).  https://doi.org/10.31862/1819-463X-2022-6-165-171
4. Milinsky, A. Yu., & Dneprovskaya, O. A. (2021). Improving the performance of first laboratory work in physics by university students. School of the Future, 6, 104–115. (In Russian). https://elibrary.ru/wkzyxb
5. Henderson, T. S. (2024). Eurocentric epistemologies in engineering: Manifestations in first‑year student design teams and consequences for student learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 113, 360–382. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20589
6. Subramaniam, R. C., Morphew, J. W., Rebello, C. M., & Rebello, N. S. (2025). Presenting a STEM ways of thinking framework for engineering design‑based physics problems. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 21, Article 010122. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.21.010122
7. Leung, J. K. L., Ng, D. T. K., & Tsui, C.-Y. (2024). A primer for design and systems thinkers: A first‑year engineering course for mindset development. Education Sciences, 14, Article 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14010086
8. Uden, L., Sulaiman, F., Ching, G. S., & Rosales, J. J. (2023). Integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics project‑based learning for physics learning from neuroscience perspectives. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1136246. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1136246
9. Hsieh, C., & Knight, L. (2008). Problem‑based learning for engineering students: An evidence‑based comparative study. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34, 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2007.11.007  
10. Yang, K., & Ning, Y. (2024). University physics teaching based on STEAM education concepts. US‑China Education Review A, 14, 229–234. https://doi.org/10.17265/2161-623x/2024.05.006
11. Musengimana, T., Yadav, L. L., Uwamahoro, J., & Nizeyimana, G. (2025). Instructional strategies for enhancing students’ problem‑solving skills in physics: A systematic review. Discover Education, 4, Article 380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00733-x
12. Makransky, G., & Petersen, G. B. (2019). Immersive virtual reality and learning: A meta‑analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 31, 1–40.
13. Negahban, A. (2024). Simulation in engineering education: The transition from physical experimentation to digital immersive simulated environments. Education and Information Technologies, 100, 695–708. https://doi.org/10.1177/00375497241229757
14. Kordova, S. (2020). Developing systems thinking in a Project‑Based Learning environment. International Journal of Engineering Education, 2(1), 63–81. https://doi.org/10.14710/ijee.2.1.63-81  
15. Andryukhina, L. M., Guzanov, B. N., & Anakhov, S. V. (2023). Engineering thinking: Development vectors in the context of the transformation of the scientific picture of the world. Education and Science, 8, 12–48. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2023-8-12-48
16. Ramezani, S. G., & Mostafavi, Z. S. (2025). Developing and validating a comprehensive scale for accreditation standards and quality assurance in e‑learning institutions. Educ Inf Technol, 30, 21139–21187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13587-5
17. Wang, C., Song, L., & Jiang, J. (2025). The impact of project‑based learning on university physics education: Enhancing cognitive skills and core competencies. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, Article 1495105. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1495105
18. Marcinauskas, L., Iljinas, A., Čyvienė, J., & Stankus, V. (2024). Problem‑based learning versus traditional learning in physics education for engineering program students. Education Sciences, 14, Article 154. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14020154
19. Nauryzbayeva, G., Demessinova, A., Toxanbekova, A., Kembayeva, Z., & Sabitova, A. (2025). Teaching physics to future engineers: Approaches, challenges, and prospects. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 8, 2263–2270. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14020154  
20. Juandi, T., Kaniawati, I., Samsudin, A., & Riza, L. (2024). Prospective teachers’ perception of critical and reflective thinking skills on modern physics: Rasch analysis. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 12, 137–150. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.1502503
21. Ang, H. Q., & Domingo, B. (2025). An innovative and universal teaching model in engineering education to foster industry 5.0 skills—Epic principles. Education Sciences, 15, Article 1096. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15091096
22. Alvarez, G. M., Greca, I. M., & Arriassecq, I. (2025). Problem‑based learning as a strategy for teaching physics in technical–professional higher education: A case study in Chile. Education Sciences, 15, Article 941. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15080941  
23. Didiş, N., & Pospiech, G. (2024). Examination of students’ physics knowledge construction with peers and metacognitive evaluations. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 20, Article 020153. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevphyseducres.20.020153
24. Subramaniam, R. C., Borse, N., Bralin, A., Morphew, J. W., Rebello, C. M., & Rebello, N. S. (2025). Investigating the design‑science connection in a multi‑week engineering design‑based introductory physics laboratory task. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 21, Article 010118. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.21.010118
25. Li, J., & Liang, W. (2024). Effectiveness of virtual laboratory in engineering education: A meta‑analysis. PLoS ONE, 19, Article e0316269. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0316269
26. Benítez Barajas, L. J. (2025). The case method as structured rational thinking for learning physics principles in engineering. In World Conference on Research in Teaching and Education Proceedings (Vol. 8, pp. 1–15). Berlin, Germany. https://doi.org/10.33422/teconf.v1i1.976
27. Tariq, R., Aponte Babines, B. M., Ramirez, J., Alvarez‑Icaza, I., & Naseer, F. (2025). Computational thinking in STEM education: Current state‑of‑the‑art and future research directions. Frontiers in Computer Science, 6, Article 1480404. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2024.1480404
28. Semenkova, T. A., & Fedosov, A. Yu. (2024). Formation of engineering thinking of schoolchildren by means of 3D modeling in the context of the implementation of STEAM education technologies. International Journal of Open Information Technologies, 12, 102–117. (In Russian). https://elibrary.ru/qcjllx
29. Persano Adorno, D., & Pizzolato, N. (2025). Benefits of a physics‑driven interdisciplinary final project for mechanical engineering undergraduates. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, 1–14. https://doi/10.1177/03064190251319413
30. Liu, X., Li, M., Yan, Q., & Ni, X. (2024). Exploring the teaching reform of college physics in private universities based on the integration of industry and education. Physics and Engineering, 34, 61–65. https://doi.org/10.26599/phys.2024.9320311
31. Varela, C., Rebollar, C., Garcia, O., Bravo, E., & Bilbao, J. (2019). Skills in computational thinking of engineering students of the first school year. Heliyon, 5, Article e02820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02820
32. Wang, X., Wang, T., & Liu, H. (2023). Rerandomization in stratified randomized experiments. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 118, 1295–1304. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2021.1990767

For citation: Milinskiy, A. Yu. (2026). Modern approaches to the development of engineering thinking in the process of studying mechanics. CITISE, 2, 628-637.(In Russian).