UDC 378

Likhacheva O.N.¹ (Krasnodar, Russian Federation) – olga-lihacheva@rambler.ru; Kolendo D.S.¹ (Krasnodar, Russian Federation) – daniil-colendo@mail.ru; Dzhigir R.Ye.¹ (Krasnodar, Russian Federation) – romadg@mail.ru

¹IMSIT Academy

Abstract. The current reality is that higher education should provide and be responsible not only for training high-quality specialists, competitive professionals in their field, but also for training worthy citizens of their country, patriots who have an active life position and are aware of the values and unshakable principles. For this reason, the education of young people should be carried out in several ways, primarily through the use of their subject and discipline, as well as through the organization of extracurricular activities, such as various events that instill in students a love for their small and large homeland, guide young people towards taking responsibility for their actions, and shape their values and promote eternal values. If patriotic events are planned by the relevant university departments, then the patriotic component should be more clearly defined and implemented in a synchronized and systematic manner in the context of teaching. The relevance of this work lies in the urgent need for teachers to systematize projects and topics related to patriotic education within various disciplines. The subject of this research is the implementation and systematization of the patriotic component in teaching activities at a modern university. The scientific novelty of this research lies in the development of a set of recommendations that can be used in the educational process to enhance patriotic activities during classes. The practical significance of this work lies in the potential for using the proposed materials in academic activities at the university and promoting patriotic sentiments among young people.

Keywords: patriotism, education, academic disciplines, development, influence, active lifestyle, quality citizen, and educational activities.

References:

1. Likhacheva, O. N., Koroleva, Yu. V., & Tymchuk, E. V. (2019). Regional component as an aspect of the modern educational process at a university: The example of a foreign language. The World of Science, Culture, Education, 1(74), 95–97. (In Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/izycgg
2. Grechushkina, N. V. (2021). Online course: Models of application in the educational process. Higher Education in Russia, 30(4), 120–130. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-4-120-130
3. Igebaeva, F. A. (2017). Speech culture in business communication of a specialist. Innovative Science, 2-2, 282–284. (In Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/xvsjjt    
4. Tretyakova, M. F., & Borovikova, K. V. (2021). Review of blended learning models: Theoretical and applied aspects. Amur Scientific Bulletin, 3, 36–44. (In Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/dycfyk
5. Chesnokova, N. E. (2021). On the issue of integrating online courses into the educational program in a foreign language at a non‑linguistic university. World of Science, Culture, Education, 2(87), 115–118. (In Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/ymvpqj
6. Likhacheva, O. N., Shilovich, O. B., Tymchuk, E. V., Shiyan, S. I., Pupkova, Yu. V., & Kostenko, R. V. (2020). Modern approaches to polytechnic education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. Krasnoyarsk Science and Technology City Hall. IOP Publishing Limited. (In Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/xeugqx
7. Suvorova, M. V. (2021). Analysis of the role of metaphorical competence in full‑fledged language acquisition in the paradigm of the international standard ‘Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Companion Volume with New Descriptors’. Actual Problems of German, Romance, and Russian Studies, 2, 112–114. (In Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/aqvdtv
8. Agibalov, A. S. (2024). Understanding the methodological foundations of pedagogical research. In Problems of Continuous Pedagogical Education (pp. 24–29). Tyumen State University. (In Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/flqxmv
9. Cherkasova, E. A. (2023). Application of artificial intelligence in teaching English at a non‑linguistic university: Analysis of GPT Chat in the context of assessing written work. Business. Education. Law, 4(65), 437–442. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.25683/VOLBI.2023.65.837
10. Khainovsky, S. E. (2022). Interactive teaching methods and their relevance today. Pedagogical Journal, 12(4-1), 296–304. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.34670/AR.2022.36.62.037
11. Nefedova, A. S. (2018). Patriotic education of students in a modern university. Scientific Notes of the Transbaikal State University, 13(5), 71–76. (In Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/ynfxad
12. Atyaksheva, D. A., & Railyan, V. A. (2025). Fostering patriotism in students through extracurricular activities. The World of Science. Pedagogy and Psychology, 13(2), 10–17. (In Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/emvkhb
13. Levshin, E. O. (2016). Speech and communication culture. Young Scientist, 13-2(117), 50–52. (In Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/wggayb
14. Khimik, V. V., & Volkova, L. B. (2016). Speech culture and business communication. Yurait. (In Russian). https://www.elibrary.ru/vtvvcf
15. Zhdanova, O. V. (2023). Understanding the pedagogical and socio‑cultural heritage of the region in the context of modern educational problems. CITISE, 4, 88–95. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.15350/2409-7616.2023.4.08

For citation: Likhacheva, O. N., Kolendo, D. S., Dzhigir, R. Ye. (2026). Teaching students’ patriotism in modern universities. CITISE, 1, 325-332. (In Russian).