CITISE
ISSN 2409-7616
2025;2(44)
Pedagogical sciences
Downloads

Rezer T.M., Pyrkova T.A., Pruksaseat Ch.

SYSTEM OF PEDAGOGICAL CONDITIONS TO DEVELOP POSTGRADUATES’ METHODOLOGICAL READINESS FOR PROFESSIONAL AND PEDAGOGOCAL ACTIVITIES [In English]

UDC 378.1

Rezer T.M.1 (Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation) – t.m.rezer@urfu.ru; Pyrkova T.A.1 (Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation) – t.a.pyrkova@urfu.ru; Pruksaseat Ch.1 (Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation) – chanittrap@gmail.com

1Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin

Abstract. The article examines the system of pedagogical conditions that contribute to the development of methodological readiness of postgraduate students for their professional and pedagogical activity. The relevance of the topic is determined by the necessity to train highly qualified specialists who possess the theoretical knowledge and practical skills necessary for successful work in the educational sphere. The aim of the study is to present the system of pedagogical conditions propelling the development of methodological readiness of postgraduate students to perform professional and pedagogical activities. The comparative method is used to analyse Russian and foreign literature on the pedagogical conditions to enhance the professional and pedagogical activities of postgraduate students and develop their methodological readiness. System analysis identified types and forms of pedagogical conditions and was used to establish the relationship between them. Thematic analysis of sources was employed to identify common themes, trends, and gaps in research to compare Russian and international educational environments.  The key pedagogical conditions contributing to the development of methodological readiness of postgraduate students were identified. They include individual approach, mentoring, practical orientation, use of modern educational technologies, creation of a favourable educational environment, development of scientific thinking, evaluation, and feedback.  The results of the study posit the importance of a systematic approach to train postgraduate students. The development of methodological readiness of graduate students is a multifaceted process that requires a comprehensive approach and consideration of various factors. Further research in this area is recommended in order to optimise educational processes and improve the effectiveness of specialist training in the educational sector.

Keywords: pedagogical conditions, methodological readiness, professional and pedagogical activities, postgraduate students, mentoring, practical orientation, educational environment, modern educational technologies, scientific thinking, feedback.

References:

  1. Habrusiev V.Yu., Tereshchuk G.V., Stepanyuk A.V. Pedagogical conditions for the formation of an effective information and learning environment in higher education institutions. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 2023, no. 95 (3), pp. 183-196. DOI: 10.1080/17482631.2018.1508171
  2. Sysoeva Е.Yu. Training of postgraduate students – future teachers to pedagogical activities. Vestnik of Samara University. History, Pedagogics, Philology, 2020, no. 26(4), pp. 49–56. (In Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/yekssn
  3. Filatova Z.М. Pedagogical conditions, structure and content of teacher professional training in terms of creation and application of electronic teaching materials. Modern High-tech Technologies, 2016, no. 11–2, pp. 386-391. (In Russian). URL:  https://www.elibrary.ru/xefccd
  4. Rezer Т.М., Pyrkova Т.А., Ketrish Е.V., Pruksaseat Ch. Methodological readiness of PhD students for professional and pedagogical activities: state of the art. Modern problems of science and education, 2024, no. 3. (In Russian). DOI: 10.17513/spno.33365
  5. Volodin А.А., Bondarenko N.G. Analysis of “Organizational and pedagogical conditions concept. Izvestiya TulGU. Humanitarian sciences, 2014, no.2, pp.143-152. (In Russian). URL:  https://www.elibrary.ru/stycal
  6. Minina V.V. Organizational and pedagogical conditions for practice-oriented assessment of results in professional education. Modern problems of science and education, 2022, no. 4. (In Russian). DOI: 10.17513/spno.31898
  7. Melnikov S.L, Karneeva О.А. Psychological and pedagogical conditions of formation of competence of student’s personality in the process of education in higher education institutions. BSU bulletin, 2014, no.1, pp. 238-243. (In Russian). URL:  https://www.elibrary.ru/tlfbdf
  8. Kryzhevskaya N.N, Kusakina E.A. Psychological and pedagogical conditions of emotional stability development of students of humanitarian profile. Problems of modern pedagogical education. Collection of research papers, 2023, no. 78 (3), pp. 258–261. (In Russian).  URL:  https://www.elibrary.ru/lmlmnm
  9. Terentev E.A., Bednyi B. I. Problems and perspective for the development of doctoral education in Russia: The view of regional universities. Higher Education in Russia, 2020, no.10, pp. 9–28. (In Russian). URL:  https://www.elibrary.ru/pfbwyf
  10. Tashcheva A.I., Gridneva S.V., Arpentieva M.R. New problems of the psychological and pedagogical support of teacher education in innovative educational environment. Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin, 2023, no. 1 (130), pp. 57–65. (In Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/oadxjm
  11. Rudometova L.T. Educational environment as a leading factor of personal and professional development of a student. Vestnik of North-Eastern Federal University, 2020, no. 33, pp. 78–83. (In Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/rvzozm
  12. Ivanova V.I. Acmeological laws and mechanisms of formation of the educational environment of preparation of experts. Acmeology, 2008, 2008, no. 3(27), pp. 16-23. (In Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/kbbycl
  13. Makaremi N., Yildirim S., Morgan G. T. et al. Impact of classroom environment on student wellbeing in higher education: Review and future directions.  Building and Environment, 2024, no. 265 (3), 111958. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111958
  14. Fedotova M.G, Smirnova М.V. Research and educational environment as a factor in improving of the future teacher training. Ivzestia of the Volgograd State Pedagogical University, 2019, no. 2(135), pp. 9–12. (In Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/xprbey
  15. Schmidt M., Hansson E. Doctoral students’ well-being: a literature review. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 2018, no. 13 (1), 1508171. DOI: 10.1080/17482631.2018.1508171
  16. Litalien D., Tóth-Király I., Guay F. PhD students’ motivation profiles: A self-determination theory perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2024, no. 77, 102279. DOI: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2024.102279
  17. Acquaye D., Pownall I. Guiding without prescribing – A structured image approach to postgraduate research support. The International Journal of Management Education, 2021, no. 19 (2), 100509. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100509
  18. Yang M., Yuan R. Early-stage doctoral students’ conceptions of research in higher education: cases from Hong Kong. Teaching in Higher Education, 2023, no. 28 (1), pp. 85–100. DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2020.1775191
  19. Klimova А.S., Krasinskaya L.F. Postgraduate students’ individual educational paths: design principles and implementation conditions (on the example of a technical university). Higher Education in Russia, 2021, no.11, pp. 110–124. (In Russian). DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-11-110-124
  20. Grigoryeva А.V., Terentev Е.А. Doctoral Students’ Academic Supervision: A Systematic Review of Approaches to Conceptualization and Empirical Analysis. University Management: Practice and Analysis, 2021, no. 25 (1), pp. 49–61. (In Russian). DOI: 10.15826/umpa.2021.01.004
  21. Anderson M., Mitchell B., Northcote M. et al. The construction of a postgraduate student and supervisor support framework: Using stakeholder voices to promote effective postgraduate teaching and learning practice. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 2018, no. 15 (2), pp. 6.
  22. Killen P.O. Good Mentoring: fostering excellent practice in higher education – By Jeanne Nakamura and David J. Shernoff with Charles H. Hooker. Teaching Theology & Religion, 2012, no. 15 (2), pp. 192–194.  DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9647.2012.00791.x
  23. Jairam D., Kahl D.H., Jr. Navigating the doctoral experience: The role of social support in successful degree completion. International journal of doctoral studies, 2012, no. 7, pp. 311–329. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.28945/1700
  24. Rudenko I.V., Sarkisova I.V. Mentoring as a form of scientific and methodological support of the professional development of future teachers. Scientific Vector of the Balkans, 2021, vol. 5, no. 2(12), pp. 15–20. (In Russian). DOI: 10.34671/SCH.SVB.2021.0502.0003
  25. Baker V.L., Pifer M.J., Flemion B. Process Challenges and Learning-Based Interactions in Stage 2 of Doctoral Education: Implications from Two Applied Social Science Fields. The Journal of Higher Education, 2013, no. 84 (4), pp. 449–476. DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2013.11777298
  26. Laura L.P., Green S.G., Bauer T.N. Does Adviser Mentoring Add Value? A Longitudinal Study of Mentoring and Doctoral Student Outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 2006, no. 47 (4), pp. 451-476. DOI: 10.1007/s11162-005-9003-2
  27. Smith E.J., Morrell-Scott N., Roberts D., Jones I. Research in action-developing and evaluating student research placement experience. Nurse Education Today, 2024, no. 133, 106049. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2023.106049
  28. Nosova L.А. Essence and characteristics of professional pedagogical activity in the realities of modern education. E–Scio, 2021, no. 3 (54). (In Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/gozkxv
  29. Cardoso S., Santos S., Diogo S. et al. The transformation of doctoral education: a systematic literature review. Higher Education, 2022, no. 84, pp. 885–908. DOI: 10.1007/s10734-021-00805-5
  30. 30.     Vilser M., Gentele S., Mausz I. Putting PhD students front and center: an empirical analysis using the Effort-Reward Imbalance Model. Frontiers in Psychology, 2023, no. 14, pp. 01–15. DOI:  10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1298242
  31. Novikov S.V. Current state and trends in the development of the Russian higher education system. Journal of Economics, Entrepreneurship and Law, 2023, no. 13 (9), pp. 3589–3604. (In Russian). DOI: 10.18334/epp.13.9.118723
  32. Balakireva E.I., Bolshakova A.S. Forming graduate students’ vision regarding pedagogical activity of a classical university professor. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2023, no. 23 (4), pp. 458–463. (In Russian). DOI: 10.18500/1819-7671-2023-23-4-458-463
  33. Al-Araibi A.A.M., Mahrin M.N.,  Yusoff R.C.M. Technological aspect factors of E-learning readiness in higher education institutions: Delphi technique. Education and Information Technologies, 2019, no. 24(1). DOI: 10.1007/s10639-018-9780-9
  34. Mukhametzyanova F.G, Manuilov М.А., Daniliva I.Y. Pedagogical conditions of hybrid learning in higher education. Global Economy and Education, 2024, no.4. pp.  109–117. (In Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/gepgdk
  35. Pleshakov V.A, Markova V.K., Voinova О.I. Cyberpedagogy: methodology, theory and practice. Moscow Pedagogical Journal, 2021, no. 4б pp. 6–21. (In Russian). DOI: 10.18384/2310-7219-2021-4-6-21
  36. Safonova L.А., Protsenko S.I., Voinova I.V. Formation of ICT competence of the future Informatics teacher in the context of the development and application of digital educational resources. International Research Journal, 2020, no. 7-3 (97), pp. 44–47. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.23670/IRJ.2020.97.7.076
  37. Tamarskaya N.V., Bokarev М.Yu., Mamonova А. V. Interactive technologies in forming postgraduate students’ competences. Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin, 2018, no. 1, pp. 84-89. (In Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/yqrmkw
  38. Cananau I., Edling S., Haglund B. Critical thinking in preparation for student teachers’ professional practice: A case study of critical thinking conceptions in policy documents framing teaching placement at a Swedish university. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2025, no. 153: 104816. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2024.104816
  39. Stoev P., Stoeva M. Methodology for complex thinking in solving problems in engineering training. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2024, no. 58 (3), pp. 100–105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2024.07.133
  40. Martínez-García I., Witte H.D., García-Martínez J. A systematic review and a comprehensive approach to PhD students’ wellbeing. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 2024, no. 16(4), pp. 1565-1583. DOI: 10.1111/aphw.12541
  41. Rozov М.А. Mechanisms of knowledge development. Information society journal. 2011, no. 1, pp. 59–77. (In Russian).  URL:  https://www.elibrary.ru/nxkmwt
  42. Vinogradova N.V. Methodological thinking as one of the pedagogical cultures in the development of professional competencies.  The world of science, culture and education, 2022, no. 2 (93), pp. 14–18.  (In Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/axhzvw
  43. García-Carmona A. Scientific Thinking and Critical Thinking in Science Education. Science & Education, 2025, no.34, pp. 227-245. DOI: 10.1007/s11191-023-00460-5
  44. Tsopra R., Peiffer-Smadja N., Charlier C. et al. Putting undergraduate medical students in AI-CDSS designers’ shoes: An innovative teaching method to develop digital health critical thinking. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 2022, no. 171 (1), 104980. DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104980
  45. Dudung A., Hasanah U., Salman I. et al. Achievement of student graduates: The role of e-readiness, e-learning and e-book. International Journal of Data and Network Science. 2022, no. 6 (2), pp. 375-382. DOI: 10.5267/j.ijdns.2021.12.017
  46. Smith K. Developing a signature pedagogy for doctoral education. European Journal of Education, 2022, no. 57 (3), pp. 438–451. DOI: 10.1111/ejed.12520 
  47. Rezer T.M., Vladyko A.V. Feedback in digital educational environment. Journal of Secondary Vocational Education, 2022, no. 5, pp. 29–33. (In Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/kdkzmd
  48. Giniyatullina D.R. Organizing feedback between instructor and students. Problems of Modern Pedagogic Education, 2018, no. 60-2, pp. 88-90, (In Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/vnhfyp
  49. Bednyi B.I, Mironos А.А., Serova Т.V. Productivity of postgraduate students’ research work (scientometric evaluations). Higher Education in Russia, 2006, no. 7, pp. 20–36, (In Russian). URL:  https://www.elibrary.ru/ibvldf
  50. Verderame M.F., Freedman V.H., Kozlowski L.H. Point of View: Competency-based assessment for the training of PhD students and early-career scientists. eLife, 2018, no. 7, e34801. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.34801

For citation: Rezer T.M., Pyrkova T.A., Pruksaseat Ch. System of pedagogical conditions to develop postgraduates’ methodological readiness for professional and pedagogical activities. CITISE, 2025, no. 2, pp. 367-384.

ЦИТИСЭ © 2025
ЭЛ № ФС 77 - 59069 / ISSN 2409-7616