UDC 330.34

Medvedeva N.V.¹ (St. Petersburg, Russian Federation) – medvedeva-nv@ranepa.ru

¹Institute of Management of the RANEPA

Abstract. The article examines the issues of ensuring technological sovereignty in the context of the transition to technological leadership. The prerequisites for the development of a course on technological leadership are reflected. The genesis of technological leadership is revealed through the terminological status of the concepts of leadership and technological development. The issue of etymology of leadership and semantic interpretation is raised, taking into account the complexity of the set of leadership terms. The phenomenon of group leadership in relation to actors of organizations and the state is shown. The phenomenon of state leadership is linked to the international competitiveness of the state in association with the competitiveness of the national economy. The cases of achieving political goals by increasing economic pressure on states from the outside are reflected. The interrelation of the new economic reality, the intensification of international competition and the complication of the concept of competitiveness due to explosive technological growth and the emergence of new competitive technological advantages (new technologies and high-tech products that have no analogues on the market) is shown. The dual nature of the acceleration of economic development as an objective process is revealed, which is associated with technological improvements, and within the framework of the development line set by the state. Attention is focused on the directives of the given course – the concept of technological development, the strategy of scientific and technological development, priority areas of scientific and technological development and the list of the most important high-tech technologies, the draft law on technological policy, which link the provision of technological development with the achievement of technological leadership. The role of technological leadership as a source of increasing returns from technology development is emphasized, which served as an argument to give technological leadership the status of a national development goal. Special attention is paid to technical leadership in the system of national development goals and the formation of national projects to ensure it. The conclusion is confirmed that measures to create own lines of technology development and production in critical areas are a means of strengthening technological sovereignty and technological leadership.

Keywords: new economic reality, technological development, technological sovereignty, technological leadership, national goals, national projects.

References:

1. Belikova S.S., Belikov A.V. East and West: global technological confrontation. Management, 2023, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 109-119. (In Russian). DOI: 10.26425/2309-3633-2023-11-3-109-119
2. Volchik V.V. Increasing returns and the Russian innovation system. Management of Science: Theory and Practice, 2022, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 88-116. (In Russian). DOI: 10.19181/smtp.2022.4.4.6
3. Vyalov N.V., Mogilevskaya N.V. Analysis of the trend of mutual integration between the EAEU, SCO and BRICS. International Scientific Research Journal, 2023, no. 3 (129), port number 19. (In Russian). DOI: 10.23670/IRJ.2023.129.59
4. Gareev T.R. Technological sovereignty: from conceptual contradictions to practical implementation. Terra Economicus, 2023, no. 21(4), pp. 38-54. (In Russian). DOI: 10.18522/2073-6606-2023-21-4-38-54
5. Dementiev V.E. Technological sovereignty and priorities of localization of production. Terra Economicus, 2023, no. 21(1), pp. 6-18. (In Russian). DOI: 10.18522/2073-6606-2023-21-1-6-18
6. Kazantsev S.V. On achieving strategic goals and ensuring the security of modern Russia. The World of the New Economy, 2022, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 17-27. (In Russian). DOI: 10.26794/2220-6469-2022-16-1-17-27
7. Kuznetsov A.V. Economic stability of Russia in the conditions of technological transformations. Humanities. Bulletin of the Financial University, 2019, no. 9(6), pp. 45-52. (In Russian). DOI: 10.26794/2226-7867-2019-9-6-45-52
8. Lebedeva L.F., Aksenov P.A. Global competition in new technological realities. International Trade and Trade Policy, 2022, vol. 8, no. 2 (30), pp. 31-39. (In Russian). DOI: 10.21686/2410-7395-2022-2-31-39
9. Medvedeva N.V. Approaches to assessing the achievement of technological sovereignty. Issues of Innovative Economics, 2024, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 91-104. (In Russian). DOI: 10.18334/vinec.14.1.120653
10. Nevskaya N. A. The impact of technology on the transformation of markets and the struggle for global industrial leadership. Bulletin of the NGIEI, 2020, no. 12 (115), pp. 58-68. (In Russian). DOI: 10.24411/2227-9407-2020-10120
11. Popov E.V., Koch I.A., Semyachkov K.A. Economic targeting of smart cities development. Issues of Innovative Economics, 2022, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 859-878. (In Russian). DOI: 10.18334/vinec.12.2.114933
12. Prokhorov A.P. Prospects for the implementation of national projects of the Russian Federation for the period 2025-2030, taking into account the new model of economic development. The World of the New Economy, 2024, no. 18(1), pp. 18-26. (In Russian). DOI: 10.26794/2220-6469-2024-18-1-18-26
13. Crespi F., Caravella S., Menghini M., Salvatori C. European technological sovereignty: An emerging framework for policy strategy. Intereconomics, 2021, vol. 56(6), pp. 348–354. DOI: 10.1007/s10272-021-1013-6
14. Edler J., Blind K., Kroll H., Schubert T. Technology sovereignty as an emerging frame for innovation policy. Defining rationales, ends and means. Research Policy, 2023, vol. 52(6), 104765. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2023.104765
15. Inoue H., Todo Y. Propagation of Overseas Economic Shocks through Global Supply Chains: Firm-level evidence, 2022. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4183736
16. March C., Schieferdecker I. Technological sovereignty as ability, not autarky. International Studies Review, 2023, vol. 25(2). DOI:10.1093/isr/viad012

For citation:  Medvedeva N.V. Developing a course on technological leadership. CITISE, 2024, no.3, pp. 300-309.