UDC 378.046.4

Svyatov A.G.¹ (Moscow, Russian Federation) – cuznetsovsenya@yandex.ru

¹Moscow Pedagogical State University

Abstract. Training and development activities are carried out strategically to enhance the knowledge and skills of employees in order to achieve organizational goals. As we move into a knowledge of the society that emphasizes the construction of knowledge, it is learning that becomes increasingly important. A key part of this is on-the-job learning, driven by the impact of changes in demographics, skill requirements, technology, and the attitudes and roles of people in different institutions and communities. Transitions from school to work are no longer as clear and linear as they used to be. Learning is no longer limited to “primary” activities in a formal classroom environment. Jobs and careers are no longer static and predetermined entities. Knowledge is not necessarily individualized. Corporate education and public policy regarding public servants are essential thematic principles for understanding educational knowledge in order to ensure accountability of public authorities. Growing discussion and new research, preparation of the territory and the formation of these specialists make it possible to understand the actual state of the civil service in the Russian Federation. How an entire organization learns can play an important role in its innovation and profitability. The effective solutions to the training and development challenges of the employees should be considered as an investment rather than an expense for the organizations. This statement is mainly due to the fact that the allocated financial resources are recouped through the gained competitive advantages and performance enhancement. This article is concerned with a pressing issue of the corporate learning problem among the state organization employees in Russian Federation. The article deals with the categories of professional activity and corporate education. The specificity of the professional activities of the government employees is revealed as well.

Keywords: professional development of government officials, corporate education, corporate activity.

References:

1. Bargsteda M.R., Ramírez-Vielma R., Yeves J. Professional Self-efficacy and Job Satisfaction: The Mediator Role of Work Design. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 2019, vol. 35, no. 3, pp.157-163 DOI: 10.5093/jwop2019a18
2. Chatjuthamard P., Jiraporn P., Karamahmutoğlu M.K. et al. Corporate culture, corporate governance, and independent directors: evidence from textual analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2024, pp.189-197.  DOI:10.1108/SBR-05-2023-0138
3. Hourneaux Jr, F., Gabriel, M.L.d.S., Gallardo-Vázquez D.A. Triple bottom line and sustainable performance measurement in industrial companies. Revista de Gestão, 2023, vol. 25 (3), pp. 413-429.  DOI: 10.1108/REGE-04-2018-0065
4. Judge T.A., Bono J.E. Relationship of core self-evaluations traits – self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2021, vol. 86 (1), pp. 80-92. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.80
5. Mamatelashvili O.V., Mukhamadieva E.F., Shaibakova E.R. et al. Strategic management of corporate educational system formation and development. London, European Publisher Publ., 2020.  pp. 698-708. DOI: 10.15405/epsbs.2020.10.03.82
6. Mohammadi F., Kohan S., Farzi S. et al. The effect of pregnancy training classes based on bandura self-efficacy theory on postpartum depression and anxiety and type of delivery. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 2021, vol. 10, iD. 273.  DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_105_21
7. Robson S., Shimels W. Entrepreneurial leadership, learning organization and organizational culture relationship: a systematic literature review. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 2023, vol. 12(38), pp. 1-20. DOI: 10.1186/s13731-023-00305-z
8. Ventura M., Salanova M., Llorens S. Professional self-efficacy as a predictor of burnout and engagement: The role of challenge and hindrance demands. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 2020, vol. 149 (3), pp. 277-302. DOI: 10.1080/00223980.2013.876380
9. Zellars K.L., Perrewé P. L. Rossi A.M. et al. Moderating effects of political skill, perceived control, and job-related self-efficacy on the relationship between negative affectivity and physiological strain. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2021, vol. 29, issue 5, pp. 549-571.  DOI:10.1002/job.484
10. Bodrov V.A. Psychology of professional suitability. Moscow, PER SE Publ., 2020. 511 p. (In Russian).
11. Weber M. Predawn. Pictures of working life from the 19th century.  Leningrad, State. Publ., 1924. (In Russian).
12. Zhivodvorov I.D., Ryazheva Yu.I. Factors influencing the implementation of the production program. Samara, Samara National Research University named after Academician S.P. Koroleva Publ., 2021. vol. 2. pp. 668-669. (In Russian).URL: https://elibrary.ru/pyvbfo
13. Lugovsky V.A. Psychology of professional activity. Krasnodar, KubSAU Publ., 2021. – 100 p. (In Russian).
14. Markova T.L. The phenomenon of “professional activity”: conceptual analysis. World of Science. Sociology, Philology, Cultural Studies, 2016, vol. 7, no. 3. (In Russian).URL: https://elibrary.ru/zngvnb
15. Merton R. The Matthew effect in science. II: Accumulation of advantages and symbolism of intellectual property. Thesis, 1993, no. 3, pp. 606-623. (In Russian).
16. Troitskaya A.V. Psychological components of the professional development of an employee’s personality. Bulletin of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2010, no. 3, pp. 59-61. (In Russian).URL: https://elibrary.ru/mswjnz

For citation: Svyatov A.G. Modern challenges of corporate education for the governmental employees. CITISE, 2024, no. 2, pp. 478-485.