UDC 378:78.606:025.4.03

Strelnikov S.S.¹ (Tyumen, Russian Federation) – sss15@yandex.ru

¹Tyumen State Medical University

Abstract. The article explores the feasibility of employing bibliometric analysis within the domains of cultural and pedagogical studies, specifically to delineate the evolution in scholarly perspectives regarding information and digital literacy. An elucidative overview of the prevailing research landscape pertaining to information and digital literacy is provided, alongside a detailed examination of bibliographic keyword analysis methodologies. The crux of this analytical approach resides in juxtaposing primary and ancillary keywords within article metadata, thereby charting the trajectory of their application over time. This investigation aims to unearth the analytical capabilities of bibliometric tools in discerning conceptual disparities between “digital literacy” and “information literacy” through the scrutiny of corollary keywords in scholarly publications. The objectives delineated for this inquiry encompass: evaluating the prevalence of primary keywords, identifying the most recurrent ancillary keywords within literature on information and digital culture, establishing intersections amongst these categories, generating compilations for primary keywords featuring shared ancillary keywords, curating a roster of researchers engaged in the utilization of these terminologies, and conducting a substantive review of each identified scholar’s contributions. The methodological framework incorporated an examination of publications catalogued within the Russian Science Citation Index, supplemented by the analytical functionalities of the integrated services provided by elibrary.ru. The findings corroborate the inherent suitability of the bibliometric analysis technique for the enunciated objectives, whilst also articulating its constraints and the potential avenues for its application. This investigation substantiates the premise that bibliometric analysis constitutes a viable instrument for elucidating the nuanced divergences between “digital literacy” and “information literacy” within the expanse of academic literature, thereby contributing to the refinement of discourse in the intersecting realms of information studies and educational research.

Keywords: bibliometrics, information literacy, digital literacy, keywords, term, scientometrics, scientific publications.

References:

1. Vasil’eva M.R., Apanovich M.S., Myagkova E.G. Analysis of medical students’ information  competence at initial  stage of training. Issues in Journalism, Education, Linguistics, 2023, vol 42 (1), pp. 66-79. (In Russian). DOI: 10.52575/2712-7451-2023-42-1-66-79
2. Gryaznova E.V., Kochneva E.M. Individualization in the information space of the digital culture: problems and prospects. Azimut of Scientific Research: Pedagogy and Psychology, 2021, vol 10, no 3(36), pp. 343-345. (In Russian). DOI: 10.26140/anip-2021-1003-0087
3. Gryaznova E.V., Goncharuk A.G., Hlap A.A. et al. Personification in information socialization of personality: problems and reasons therefore. Psychologist, 2019, vol. 3, pp. 21-31. (In Russian). DOI: 10.25136/2409-8701.2019.3.29964  
4. Yelkina Е.Е. Digital culture as a field of interdisciplinary research: methodological approaches and development trends. International Journal of Open Information Technologies, 2018, vol. 6(12), pp. 67–78. (In Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/rytigz
5. Ivanov А.V. Conceptual ideas of new education in the context of the information educational paradigm. CITISE, 2022, no 4, pp. 188-198. (In Russian). DOI: 10.15350/2409-7616.2022.4.18
6. Kalimzhanova R.L. Culture and education as a phenomenon of the socium: their synchronous development. CITISE, 2018, no. 2, pp. 15. (In Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/ybqljb
7. Kozyr N.S. The keywords for regional economies: Scientometric analysis. Scientific and Technical Libraries. 2022, vol. 6, pp. 100-121. (In Russian). DOI: 10.33186/1027-3689-2022-6-100-121
8. Kraynov A.L. Transhumanism as the Ideology of a New Social Order. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2017, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 23–27. (In Russian). DOI: 10.18500/1819-7671-2017-17-1-23-27   
9. Krainov A.L. Digital culture as an indicator of information society maturity. Philosophy and humanities in information society, 2022, no. 2(36), pp. 47-53. (In Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/xxaceu
10. Kuchmurukova E.A., Shanginova G.A., Kuchmurukov V.V. The information culture of teenagers in the context of modern education paradigm. Scientific and Technical Libraries, 2023, vol. 12, pp. 130-148. (In Russian). DOI: 10.33186/1027-3689-2023-12-130-148
11. Mazov N.A., Gureev V.N., Glinskikh V.N. Bibliometric aspect of the detection of perspective areas in research organization: case study of earth sciences. Russian Journal of Geophysical Technologies, 2020, vol. 3, pp. 4-17. (In Russian). DOI: 10.18303/2619-1563-2020-3-4
12. Malahov V.A. Bibliometric analysis as a method of scientific research: opportunities and limitations. Naukovedcheskie issledovaniya, 2022, no 1, pp. 212-227. (In Russian). DOI: 10.31249/scis/2022.01.10
13. Maslakova M.V. Digital culture as a factor of formation and development of the university electronic information educational environment. Culture and Education, 2020. no. 2, vol. 37, pp. 5-14. (In Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/lqfkgt
14. Milevskaya IA, Pirumova LN. Identification of promising research areas in the plant protection area. Achievements of Science and Technology of AICis, 2021, vol. 35, no 12, pp. 5-11. (In Russian). DOI: 10.53859/02352451_2021_35_12_5
15. Mukhametshin R.R. Electronic, Digital, Distance and Blended Learning: Terminological Analysis. Russian Journal of Library Science, 2022, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 103-111. (In Russian). DOI: 10.25281/0869-608X-2022-71-1-103-111  
16. Prokudin D.E. The limits of information culture. Bulletin of Leningrad State University named after A.S. Pushkin, 2009, vol. 2, no 3-1, pp. 63-70. (In Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/kwpkcp
17. Prokudin D.E. From “infomatization” to “digitalization”. Philosophical analytics of the digital era: a collection of scientific articles. St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg State University Publ., 2020, pp. 38-52. (In Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/jmvden
18. Strelnikov S.S., Katkova A.L., Turov R.S. Definition of the concept of student’s information culture. World of Science. Pedagogy and psychology, 2022, vol. 10, no 6. (In Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/squekz
19. Almatrafi O., Johri A., Lee H. A systematic review of AI literacy conceptualization, constructs, and implementation and assessment efforts (2019–2023). Computers and Education Open, 2024, vol. 6, iD. 100173. DOI: 10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100173
20. Guerola-Navarro V., Stratu-Strelet D., Botella-Carrubi D. et al. Media or information literacy as variables for citizen participation in public decision-making? A bibliometric overview. Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship, 2023, vol. 2 (1), iD. 100030. DOI: 10.1016/j.stae.2022.100030
21. Kikon P. Research Trends in Information Literacy: A Bibliometric Analysis and Network Visualisation. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 2023. vol. 12(2), pp. 251-264. URL: https://qqml-journal.net/index.php/qqml/article/view/812
22. Wang C., Si L. A Bibliometric Analysis of Digital Literacy Research from 1990 to 2022 and Research on Emerging Themes during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability, 2023, vol. 15(7), iD. 5769. DOI: 10.3390/su15075769
23. Wang G., He J. A Bibliometric Analysis on Research Trends of Digital Literacy in Higher Education from 2012 to 2021. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 2022, vol. 17(16), pp. 43–58. DOI: 10.3991/ijet.v17i16.31377

For citation: Strelnikov S.S. Information and digital literacy: bibliometric analysis.  CITISE, 2024, no. 2, pp. 320-333.