UDC 378

Tikhonova I.I.¹ (Moscow, Russian Federation) – tikhonova-ii@rudn.ru; Dzhaneryan S.T.² (Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation) – swetdjan@sfedu.ru; Gvozdeva D.I.² (Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation) – gvozdeva@sfedu.ru; Baksheev A.I.³ (Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation) – baksh-ai@yandex.ru; Shafazhinskaya N.E.⁴ (Moscow, Russian Federation) – shafazhinskaya@mail.ru

¹Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)

²Southern Federal University

³Krasnoyarsk State Medical University named after Professor V.F. Voino-Yasenetsky Ministry of Health of Russia

⁴K.G. Razumovsky Moscow State University of Technologies and Management (the First Cossack University)

Abstract. The 2020 pandemic compelled the global community to reconsider current approaches to education, shifting it into the online space. This article explores the current aspects of organizing distance learning in Russian universities. The problem addressed is the effectiveness and challenges of this form of education for both students and educators. To optimize the process of distance learning, the authors developed a cumulative assessment system for evaluating students’ educational performance. The aim of the study is to describe and assess the developed system, its relevance, and impact on academic performance. The research methodology involved a pedagogical experiment with second-year students. To test the effectiveness of the system, students were divided into two groups – experimental and control. Comparative, logical-systematic, structural-functional analyses of psychological-pedagogical literature, and surveys were applied in processing the results. The experiment identified the pedagogical effect of the developed assessment system, which increased student motivation and positive changes in learning quality. The article also highlights that the use of a virtual learning environment contributes to more flexible organization of the educational process and assessment of student activities. The authors emphasize the importance of effective management of student group work and the development of electronic etiquette within online learning. The structure of the developed assessment system has potential for use in teaching disciplines of various profiles.

Keywords: distance learning, cumulative assessment system, student motivation, learning effectiveness, self-study, pedagogy.

References:

1. Gabidullina F., Nikiforova N., Afanasyeva I. et al. Improvement of the Learning Process: The Experience of Introducing a Cumulative System in Assessing Student Learning Success in Distance Learning. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 2023, no. 12(4), pp. 1223-1230. DOI: 10.13187/ejced.2023.4.1223
2. Khizbullyina R.Z., Galina G.K., Sultanova R.M. et al. The use of distance learning as an innovative technology in the modern education system during the pandemic. CITISE, 2020, no. 4(26), pp. 149-161. (In Russian). DOI: 10.15350/2409-7616.2020.4.14
3. Ristić I., Runić-Ristić M., Savic-Tot T. et al. The Effects and Effectiveness of An Adaptive E-Learning System on The Learning Process and Performance of Students. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 2023, no. 11, pp. 77-92. DOI: 10.23947/2334-8496-2023-11-1-77-92
4. Wang L. The Impact of Student-Centered Learning on Academic Motivation and Achievement: A Comparative Research between Traditional Instruction and Student-Centered Approach. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 2023, no. 22, pp. 346-353. DOI: 10.54097/ehss.v22i.12463
5. Green B., Bianco M. L., Fussell G. et al.  Effective Online Teaching Strategies During the COVID-19 Pandemic, Bulletin of Naberezhnye Chelny State Pedagogical University, 2021, no. S2-1(31), pp. 29-33. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/wdjylh
6. Durnova N.A., Andronova T.A., Belonogova Yu.V. et al. independent student work as a way to enhance professional motivation in online learning conditions. Trends in Science and Education, 2021, no. 70-4, pp. 68-72. (In Russian). DOI: 10.18411/lj-02-2021-133
7. Brauchle J., Unger V., Schmidberger L., Hochweber J. Hybrid learning during the Covid-19 pandemic – student perspectives on opportunities and limitations of hybrid distance learning. In: European Association for Practitioner Reseatch on Improving Learning: Conference proceedings, 2024, no. 9, pp. 59-73.
8. Shaafi N., Zulkipli Z. A., Azam N. et al. Student’s acceptance of e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 2023, no. 12, pp. 2207-2214. DOI: 10.11591/ijere.v12i4.25404
9. Koroleva Yu.V., Avakimyan N.N., Datsenko E.N., et al. On the question of blended learning in a modern technical university. CITISE, 2022, no. 3(33), pp. 96-104. DOI: 10.15350/2409-7616.2022.3.08
10. Majed N., Ara A., Chowdhury S. Meeting the Challenges of Online Education during Covid-19 Pandemic: Implications for Blended Learning. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 2024, no. 12, pp. 20-31. DOI: 10.34293/education.v12i2.6837
11. Tabassum Dr., Khalid L., Taj Dr. University Students’ Perception on Blended Learning. QIRAAT Jurnal Al-Quran dan isi-isu kontemporari, 2024, no. 3, pp. 243-255.
12. Ren W., Wang R., Nor S. et al. Factors influencing students’ learning satisfaction and students’ learning outcomes in blended learning. International Journal of Education and Practice, 2024, no. 12, pp. 95-108. DOI: 10.18488/61.v12i1.3624
13. Abdullah W., Halim A., Ali R. The influence of blended learning on learning outcomes. GAHWA, 2023, no. 2, pp. 51-66. DOI: 10.61815/gahwa.v2i1.312
14. Kaban A.L., Yatağanbaba E., Çobanoğlu A.A. et al. Teachers’ readiness for blended learning, their reasons, challenges, and suggestions for practising blended learning. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 2024, no. 25, pp. 157-173. DOI: 10.17718/tojde.1210124
15. Riyadi A., Sudiyatno S. The impact of online learning on students learning motivation. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 2023, no. 13, pp. 36-43. DOI: 10.21831/jpv.v13i1.46568
16. Sivrikova N.V., Ivanov F.A., Kharlanova E.M. The relationship between proactivity and satisfaction with distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. World of Science. Pedagogy and Psychology, 2021, vol. 9, no. 5. (In Russian). URL:https://elibrary.ru/siioec  
17. Hasnat M., Kabir S.M. Online assessment challenges during the pandemic: Lessons learned from Bangladesh. International Journal on Innovations in Online Education, 2024. Vol. 8(1). DOI: 10.1615/IntJInnovOnlineEdu.2024049568
18. Palacios-Núñez M., Martínez H., López A. et al. Critical thinking and online collaborative learning in university students: a correlational study. In: Leadership in Education and Innovation in Engineering in the Framework of Global Transformations: Integration and Alliances for Integral Development, 2023.
19. Kononikhina O. V. Student motivation in distance learning. International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences, 2021, no 2-1(53), pp. 107-111. (In Russian). DOI: 10.24412/2500-1000-2021-2-1-107-111
20. Ptushko S.V., Trusova A.Yu. On the issue of increasing students’ motivation in distance learning conditions. Issue 20. – Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod State Linguistic University named after N. A. Dobrolyubov Publ., 2021, pp. 157-160. (In Russian). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=46279292
21. Beleulmi S. Challenges of online assessment during Covid-19 Pandemic: An experience of Study Skills teachers.  Afak For Sciences Journal, 2024, vol. 7(02), pp. 49-62.
22. Rini H., Somantri G., Pattinasarany I. The Analysis of Teachers’ Digital Habitus during Distance Learning Implementation in the COVID-19 Pandemic Era.  Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Studies, 2024, vol. 6, pp. 21-30. DOI: 10.32996/jhsss.2024.6.4.3
23. Amorado R., Vilchez R. Remote Integrity and Accountability Baseline Profile of Academic Fraud and Cheating in Online Classes.  Migration Letters, 2024, vol. 20, pp. 1-6. DOI:10.59670/ml.v20iS11.5662

For citation: Tikhonova I.I., Dzhaneryan S.T., Gvozdeva D.I., Baksheev A.I., Shafazhinskaya N.E. System for assessing the success of online learning students under quarantine restrictions. CITISE, 2024, no. 2, pp. 199-211.