DOI: http://doi.org/10.15350/2409-7616.2020.2.34

Anna A. Riutli – Master, Saint-Petersburg National Research University of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1585-715X, E-mail: rytliann@gmail.com

Mikhail Y. Larionov – Master, Saint-Petersburg National Research University of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation, E-mail: larionoff.mish@gmail.com

Boris A. Varlamov – PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Faculty of Technology Management and Innovation, Saint-Petersburg National Research University of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0592-6465, E-mail: varlamov@itmo.ru

Abstract. In modern conditions, there is growing interest in improving the state order system and evaluating its activities. This topic is relevant because the emphasized state of the budget system contributes to the application of new options for using the budget at different levels. This system can be considered as saving budgetary resources that provide customers with high quality of purchased goods, works and services. The adoption of the Federal Law of No. 44 should be called the stage of reforming the budget sphere. It is about continuing to implement the idea of ​​increasing the efficiency of the use of budget funds by suppliers. Reforms occurred due to the fact that the role of state institutions is quite high. A significant part of these facilities are medical facilities. Significant resources are spent on their maintenance. The provision of medical services and maintaining a healthy population is one of the country’s priorities. At present, one of the main indicators that allow us to effectively carry out medical activities, use modern equipment, transport, maintain institutions in good condition, is the placement of state and municipal orders. The process of conducting a state order is laborious, responsible and requires impressive attention from specialists of a budgetary healthcare institution. Medicines, medicines, medical equipment that were not purchased and not paid during the specified period, communication services, utilities, etc. they can adversely affect the performance of its basic functions, which is unacceptable. Public procurements currently provide for the satisfaction of the needs of the state and its entities, and also act as one of the main levers for regulating the economic and social sphere. To achieve the acceptable functioning of the economy and solving the main tasks facing the state, it is necessary to rationally and efficiently use budgetary resources. The contract system is aimed at achieving the goal. It should be noted that the implementation and improvement of goals have a high priority and can be assigned to the group of tasks of increased importance. The legislative base of procurement and organization of procurement in state (municipal) institutions is considered.

Keywords: state procurements; the federal law; audit; Contract; anti-dumping measures; customer, supplier; services; initial maximum contract price.

References:

1. Akimov N.A. On the role of additional professional education in the staffing of state and municipal procurements. Law science, 2019, no.4, pp. 31–34. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=38190515
2. Arsenyev N.B., Shibanova A.A. About the creation of a single trade aggregator, with the help of which state customers have the right to make purchases to meet state and municipal needs. Bulletin of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2019, no.3, pp. 230–234. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=38581647
3. Balaeva O.N., Yakovlev A.A., Rodionova Yu.D., Esaulov D.M. Transactional costs in the field of public procurement of the Russian Federation: an assessment at the macro level based on microdata. Journal of institutional studies, 2020, vol.10, no.3, pp. 58-84. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35693993
4. Baskakova E.A., Havronicheva N.V. New in the organization of public procurement by budgetary institutions. Scientific Thought, 2019, no.1(12), pp. 66–68. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=256678425.
5. Gaisumov A. S., Tapaeva Z. A. Kh., Tsuraev V. V. Influence of globalization on the Russian markets of commodity and labor resources. CITISE, 2019, no. 5 (22), pp. 292-301. (In Russian) DOI: http://doi.org/10.15350/24097616.2019.5.26
6. Gorokhova D.V. Public procurement in the Russian Federation: retrospective and development. Financial Journal, 2020, vol.12, no.2, pp. 57-68. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42727086
7. Zdanovskaya L.B., Tkachenko V.V., Tkachenko N.A. Analysis of the public procurement system and consideration of the practical issues of the contract system under federal law No. 44-FZ . Bulletin of the Academy of Knowledge, 2020, no.2(37), pp. 117–123. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42770032
8. Lytneva N.A., Polyanin A.V., Trunova T.A. Evaluation of the results of the contract system in public procurement management. Bulletin of the Academy of Knowledge, 2019, no.5(34), pp. 153–159. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41244328
9. Matveeva N.S. Evaluation of the efficiency and effectiveness of state (municipal) procurements. Finance and Credit, 2018, vol.24, no.3(771), pp. 505-521. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32678644
10. Melnikov I.N., Klimova A.Yu. Actual issues of improving the contract system of public procurement in the Russian Federation at the present stage. Bulletin of Kostroma State University, 2020, vol.26, no.1, pp. 217-220. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42658461
11. Morgunova I.V. The concept and essence of the contract system in the field of procurement. Fundamentals of the innovative development of science and education, 2019, pp. 120–123. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37161675
12. Pushkareva P. P. Features of agro-industrial markets: theoretical analysis. CITISE, 2019, no. 3 (20). (In Russian)URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=39135336
13. Ryazantsev I.I. Dynamics and development prospects of the public procurement system. Living standards of the population of the regions of Russia, 2019, no.2 (212), pp. 76–79. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=39374260
14. Skryl T. V., Еutaeva T. R. Assessment of the competitiveness of the Russian economy in the conditions of tightening economic sanctions. CITISE, 2019, no.1 (18). (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37292610
15. Smotritskaya I.I. The contract procurement system in the context of Russian reforms. Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2019, no.6, pp. 9–25. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41847229
16. Tyurina Yu. G., Shu’ina A. A. Financing of public procurement of goods (works, services) for state (municipal) needs: problems and current trends. Economic attitude, 2019, 9. no. 4, pp. 3001-3018. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42446310
17. Khatuntsev O.A. The contract system of public procurement. Problems of Economics and Legal Practice, 2018, no.2, pp. 221–224. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=34886764
18. Shibanova A. A. development of contract systems in Russia, the USA and the European Union. Economic attitude, 2019, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 661-668. (In Russian)URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=39191616
19. Shikalova E.V. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the public procurement system in the form of a contract system as a new institutional environment. Actual problems of the present: science and society, 2015, no.2(7), pp. 30–33. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23714511&
20. Shmeleva M.V. Efficiency of procurement as the most important goal of the Russian contract system. Legal Concept, 2018, vol.17, no.1, pp. 79-83. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35032015

For citation:

Riutli A.A., Larionov M.Y., Varlamov B.A. Legislative bases of purchasing in public institutions. CITISE, 2020, no. 2, pp. 371-384. DOI: http://doi.org/10.15350/2409-7616.2020.2.34