DOI: http://doi.org/10.15350/24097616.2019.5.38

Svetlana V. Geybuka – Candidate of pedagogical Sciences, associate Professor of the Department of Algebra and Mathematical Analysis The Novosibirsk state pedagogical University, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation, RSCI SPIN-code: 6520-5386, E-mail: geybukasv@mail.ru

Yuliya N. Kovshova – Candidate of pedagogical Sciences, associate Professor оf the Department of Geometry and methods of teaching mathematics The Novosibirsk state pedagogical University, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation, RSCI SPIN-code: 4235-6750, E-mail: santulan@yandex.ru

Abstract. In the modern world, the informatization of society is progressing at an .accelerated pace. It is an important part of the process of education. To implement the learning function, a modern teacher must have ICT competence, and for developmental activities, he must master and be able to apply the psychological and pedagogical technologies (such as inclusion in education) necessary for targeted work with various students, in particular, gifted children. The paper lists the contradictions that lead to the need to solve the problem of forming appropriate competencies in students of mathematical profiles, the research problem is formulated, that is, the problem of the qualitative preparation of a future mathematics teacher for working with gifted children, taking into account education informatization. The purpose of this research is to highlight the urgent problems of preparing math students of pedagogical universities to work with mathematically gifted children on the basis of theoretical and methodological foundations, empirical data, as well as suggesting options for solving the identified problems. In carrying out this study, both theoretical (analysis, design, modeling) and empirical (observation, experiment) methods were used. The scientific novelty of the research presented in the article lies in the statement of the problem, the determination of urgent problems in the direction being studied, and also in the development of a plan for solving these problems. The authors set forth their approaches to solving the research problem, list the participation in which types of activities, from the point of view of the authors, allow for better preparation of future mathematics teachers for working with gifted children, describe the results and outline the prospects for further research.

Keywords: intellectual giftedness, mathematically gifted children, student of the pedagogical university, informatization of education, information and communication technologies, mathematics.

References:

1. Bodunova S.A. Interactive developing educational technologies as a means of developing children’s giftedness. Science and Education: New Time, 2018, no. 5 (28), pp. 619-622.(In Russian)URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36447544
2. Bukin D. The World Wide Web as a tool for a teacher of the XXI century. Alien Learning, 2019, vol. 46, no. 4,pp. 425-432. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?Id=41162338
3. Vavilova J.E. Cyber in inclusion in the socio-philosophical perspective: opportunities and threats. Society. Inclusion, 2018,no. 1 (33), pp. 30-36.(In Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36233300
4. Gudkova T.V., Matveeva N.S., Geybuk S.V. The specificity of personality: giftedness and its individual manifestations.Philosophy of Education, 2015, no. 3 (60),pp. 91-99. (In Russian) DOI: 15372/PHE20150311 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23769413
5. Geykhman L.K., Kleiman E.I., Kleiman L.A. Ways to solve modern problems of education and upbringing of the personality in the process of becoming the information society.Bulletin of PNIPU. Problems of linguistics and pedagogy, 2018,no. 1,pp. 119 – 127.(In Russian)DOI:15593/2224-9389/2018.1.10 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32795610
6. Golubnichaya E.V. Features of the organization of teacher training for working with gifted children in the municipal education system.Pedagogy and Psychology of Education, 2019,no. 1,pp. 98-112.(In Russian)URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37278556
7. Dvoryashina L.V., Selezeva T.F. Giftedness as a result of competent pedagogical influence. Almanac of world science, 2018,no. 3 (23),pp. 124-125.(In Russian)URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36328095
8. Egorychev A.M., Semenkova M.V. The specifics of social education in the information society. Family. Society: collection of scientific articles. Under the general editorship of T.K. Rostov, 2019, pp. 100-104.(In Russian)URL:https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?Id=36901270
9. Kovshova Yu.N. Research activities of students in the field of mathematics: main directions and opportunities. Pedagogical professionalism in education: a collection of scientific papers of the XIII International Scientific and Practical Conference. Edited by E.V. Andrienko, L.P. Zhuykova, 2018, pp. 119-122. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35400727
10. Lubovsky V.I. Inclusion is a dead end for educating children with disabilities.Modern Preschool Education. Theory and practice, 2017, no. 2 (74), pp. 32-37. (In Russian)URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28780533
11. Mazilov V.A., Slepko Yu.N. Correlation of theory and method in the study of the giftedness problem. Human factor: Social psychologist, 2018, no. 2 (36), pp. 141-145.(In Russian)URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36266163
12. Maltseva E.Yu. A retrospective analysis of the development of inclusive education: international experience. Problems of modern education, 2019, n 2, pp. 80-88.(In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37825168
13. Mardahaev L.V. The special mission of the teacher and its preparation for its implementation. CITISE, 2018, no. 2 (15). (In Russian) URL:https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35737364
14. Moskovkin L. Definitions of the concept of «Method of training». Alien learning, 2018, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 449-457.(In Russian) URL:https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?Id=38072522
15. Ponomareva E.Yu. Features of the preparation of future teachers to work with gifted children. Pedagogical Bulletin, 2018, no. 3, pp. 48-49.(In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36510837
16. Rodionov M.A., Tyapina A.I., Sharapova N.N. Preparing future mathematics teachers to work with gifted students (problem statement). Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod University. N.I. Lobachevsky. Series: Social Sciences, 2017, no. 2 (46), pp. 143-150. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29908528
17. Samsonova E.V. Inclusion is a strategy for breaking the deadlock for the modern education system. Modern Preschool Education. Theory and practice, 2017, no. 5 (77), pp. 55-63.(In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29767628
18. Sinkevich I.A., Tuchkova T.V. Giftedness: the meanings of the concept and contexts of research in the perspective of «pedagogy and the psychology of giftedness». Training Psychology, 2017, no. 4, pp. 13-22.(In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28880056
19. Troeshestova D.A., Yardukhina S.A. Self-education technologies for students with mathematical talent. Problems of modern pedagogical education, 2018, no. 60-3, pp. 325-328.(In Russian)URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36333148
20. Tursunbaev S.U. Project activities of teachers in the development of giftedness in children and adolescents. Prospects for science, 2018, no. 8 (107), pp. 99-102.(In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36296666
21. Dumas D.G., Mcneish D.M. Dynamic Measurement Modeling: Using Nonlinear Growth Models to Estimate Student Learning Capacity.Еducational Rresearcher, 2017, vol.46, no. 6, pp. 284-292. DOI: 3102/0013189X17725747 URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32129894
22. Dunst C.J., Hamby D.W., Howse R.B., Wilkie H., Annas K.Metasynthesis of Preservice Professional Preparation and Teacher Education Research Studies. Education sciences, 2019, vol.9, no. 1, pp. 50. DOI: 3390/educsci9010050URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=38945790
23. KotsevaIvelina,GaydarovaMaya Integrative Stem Education: State, Challenges and Perspectives. Ctrategii na obrazovatelnata i nauchnata politika, 2019, vol.27, no. 5, pp. 476-492. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=40467511
24. Mckenney S., Schunn C.D. How Can Educational Research Support Practice at Scale? Attending to Educational Designer Needs. British Educational Research Journal, 2018, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 1084-1100. DOI: 1002/berj.3480 URL:https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?Id=38928243
25. Sergeeva M.G., Romanova N.V., Shishov S.E., Kalnei V.A., Lakhtin A.YU., Tonoyan KH.A. Tutoring Support of Learner Research Activity in the Conditions of University Education. Dilemas contemporáneos: Educación, Política y Valores, 2019, vol.7, no. S10, pp. 4. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41117542
26. Veinović Z. The Curricula Revision in the Context of Education for Sustainable Development: from the Perspective of Two Primary School Subjects’ Curricula. Zbornik instituta za pedagoska istrazivanja, 2017, vol.49, no. 2, pp. 191-212. DOI:2298/ZIPI1702191V URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35928265
27. Zainuddin Z.,Perera C.J. Exploring Students’ Competence, Autonomy and Relatedness in the Flipped Classroom Pedagogical Model. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 2019, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 115-126. DOI: 1080/0309877X.2017.1356916 URL:https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?Id=38804612

For citation:

Geybuka S.V., Kovshova Y.N.  Student trainingin work with mathematically gifted children in conditions of informatization ofeducation. CITISE, 2019, no. 5, pp. 418-427. DOI: http://doi.org/10.15350/24097616.2019.5.38