DOI: http://doi.org/10.15350/24097616.2019.5.21

Denis S. Dmitriev – Candidate Pedagogical Science, Professor, Associate Professor of Mathematics and Business Informatics Department Samara National Research University, Samara, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4945-8832, E-mail: denisdmitriev000@gmail.com

Abstract. The article discusses the problem of university teacher didactic pedagogical tools selecting for solving current professional activity innovative problems. The educational process Orientation towards the innovative focus demands the university teachers personal and professional competence (based on the job responsibilities and the professional standards and federal state higher education standards requirements identify the structure of the university teacher readiness components to new didactic tool use (e-learning tools), including a value-motivational component, cognitive component, methodical-operational component, evaluative-reflective component. It is determined in the framework of the university teacher methodical activities specifics analysis). The teacher methodical activities nature and specificity, as well as the methodical approaches (spatial, andragogic, matrix, environmental, productive, active, competency) used for analysis, allow us to determine the university teacher readiness to e-learning tools use components content in professional activities. The methodical activities changes analysis in the solving innovative problems context made it possible to identify the university teacher readiness to e-learning tools use levels (basic level, advanced level, creative level), as well as the readiness types structure (motivational readiness, methodical readiness, technological readiness, expert readiness).

Keywords: e-learning, e-learning tool, open education, information educational environment of the university, university teacher readiness.

References:

1. Solovova N.V. University methodological work management in the innovative methodological tasks implementation context. Samara, 2011. 571 p. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=19262925
2. Solovova N.V. A process approach for managing university methodological work at a. Monograph. Samara, Univers-Group Publ., 2009, 300 p. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20113592
3. Borisova S.P. E-learning means in the students – future economists professional training // Bulletin of Samara State University, 2009, no. 73, pp. 168–173. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=14777316
4. Butorina T.S., Shirshov E.V. The didactic basis for the use of information and educational technologies in the electronic textbook preparation. /Open education, 2001, no. 4, pp. 38–41. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23998083
5. Korotaeva E.V. The scientific and methodological support role of in the education theory and practice development. Pedagogical Education in Russia, 2015, no. 4, pp. 38–44. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23588886
6. Ilyin E.P. Motivation and motives. Petersburg. Peter Publ., 2000, 512 p. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23588886
7. Vinogradova G.A. Teacher professional motivation and personality orientation. Bulletin of Samara State University. History, pedagogy, philology,  2015,  4 (126), pp. 197–200. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23495214
8. Zinenko Yu.P., Volodarsky I.A. Psychological and pedagogical support of the innovative educational programs implementation . Moscow, Moscow University Publ., 2007, 120 p. (In Russian)
9. Kulyutkin Yu.N., Bezdukhov V.P. Value orientations and cognitive structures in teacher’s activity. Samara: SamGPU, 2002. 400 p. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21332829
10. Dmitriev D.S. The university teacher readiness to develop MOOC cognitive component formation model. Educational Technologies and Society, 2015, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 638–652. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23457159
11. Berezhnaya I.F. Pedagogical technology for students individual educational trajectory designing in the vocational training process. Lecturer XXI century, 2016, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 44–48. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26134866
12. Dronova T.A. The teacher is the educational system center. Pedagogical education and science, 2014, no. 6, pp. 85–88. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23298692
13. Dronova T.A., Dronov A.A. The pedagogical creativity essence. Bulletin of the Voronezh State Pedagogical University, 2014, no. 1 (262), pp. 73–78. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21725640
14. Penyaeva S.A. Reflection as a condition of the competent specialist formation.Higher Education in Russia, 2007, no. 4, pp. 31–33. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21725640
15. Sergeev I.S. Pedagogical activity fundamentals. Petersburg, Peter Publ., 2004, 316 p. (In Russian)
16. Voronina L.V., Pestov S.A. The creative projects use for the technological education teacher informational competence formation . Pedagogical education in Russia, 2013, no. 6, pp. 28–34. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21071358
17. Verbitsky A.A., Larionova O.G. Personal and competency-based approaches in education: problems of integration. Monograph. Moscow, Logos Publ., 2009, 336 p. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18419786
18. Rudneva T.I., Solovova N.V. University teacher: a new paradigm of higher education, the pedagogical activity strategy. Bulletin of Tver State University. Pedagogy and psychology, 2016, no. 4, pp. 103–109. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28158079
19. Shumakova A.V. Comparative characteristics of the spatial and systems approach in the modern educational process design. Bulletin of the Taganrog State Radio Engineering University, 2006, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 40–48. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=9305463
20. Chepkova O.N. A spatial approach to the modern education organization, children’s giftedness upbringing and development. Uchenye Zapiski Zabaykalsky State University. Vocational education, theory and teaching methods, 2011, no 6, pp. 136–141. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17240755
21. Maron A.E., Monakhova L.Yu., Sokolov V.I. Practical andragogy. Book 4. Adult education informatization. Monograph. St. Petersburg, URAO Job Publ., 2011, 350 p. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=19915359
22. Monakhov V.M., Erina T.M. A matrix approach to modeling pedagogical objects in didactic and methodological research . Standards and monitoring in education, 2015, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 28–39. (In Russian)
23. Strekalova N.B. Environmental approach factor in the humanitarian specialties students’ information and communication competence formation. Samara, 2009, 25 p. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=15937755
24. Shek G.G. The environmental approach as a pedagogical innovation and the conditions for its development. Yelets, 2001, 148 p. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=15990048
25. Bezdukhov V.P. The education humanization essence. Bulletin of the Russian Education Academy, 2009, no. 2, pp. 16-24. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=12796029
26. Zimnyaya I.A. Key competencies– the education result new paradigm. Higher education today, 2003, no. 5, pp. 34–42. (In Russian) URL: http://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?issueid=638331
27. Baydenko V.I. Competencies in vocational education (to develop a competency-based approach). Higher education in Russia, 2004, no. 11, pp. 17–22. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=9573587
28. Kiryakova A.V., Olkhovaya T.A. Innovative projects implementation fundamentals in the university education context. Bulletin of the Orenburg State University, 2013, no. 2 (151), pp. 132-139. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18959832
29. Zimnyaya I.A. Pedagogical psychology. Moscow, Logos; University Book Publ., 2007, 490 p. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20103793

For citation:

Dmitriev D.S. The essence and structure of the university teacher readiness to innovative educational problems solving. CITISE, 2019, no. 5, pp. 225-241. DOI: http://doi.org/10.15350/24097616.019.5.21