DOI: http://doi.org/10.15350/2409-7616.2020.3.20

Yuliya А. Davydova –Candidate of historical Sciences associate Professor of political Science and sociology, Russian economic University by G. V. Plekhanov, Moscow, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5660-328X, Е-mail: ylkadav@mail.ru

Ekaterina V. Kargapolova –Doctor of sociological Sciences, Professor of political science and sociology, Russian economic University by G. V. Plekhanov, Moscow, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/ 0000-0002-2892-3953, E-mail: k474671@list.ru

Natalia N. Denisenkova – Candidate of political science, associate Professor of political Science and sociology, Russian economic University by G. V. Plekhanov, Moscow, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-003-4795-7662, E-mail: natalya652008@yandex.ru

Abstract. The economic foundations of the principle of justice are one of the main ones in the state educational policy. The purpose of this study is to identify the conditions that contribute to the implementation of the principle of equity in the secondary education system. The article is based on the analysis of how fully this principle is implemented in the modern Russian school. The paper considers two main aspects of the principle of justice: justice in relation to the secondary school as a social institution and justice in the educational school environment. The authors draw attention to the principle of residual budget funding in relation to the Russian education system, to the disparity in the quality of education in different regions and in urban and rural schools. The article emphasizes the connection between the implementation of the principle of justice and information inequality in modern society. The authors note that within the framework of the national project “Education”, the state invests significant funds to reduce the disparity in the provision of schools with professional personnel and modern equipment. To find out how fully the principle of justice is implemented in the educational process of Russian schools, the authors conducted a specific sociological study, the purpose of which was to identify the opinions of students in grades 7-11 about justice in the educational process. Based on this study, the authors concluded that the majority of students believe that this principle is fully implemented in the process of training on a five-point system of evaluating the knowledge of a particular student. At the same time, they noted that the assessment of the OGE and use requires improvement and is not always fair. In conclusion, the authors concluded that the implementation of the principle of equity in the school system is one of the factors of successful socialization of young people.

Keywords: equity, secondary education, school, educational process, educational environment.

References:

1. Alekseeva M. S. Implementation of the principle of justice in education. Problems of modern science and education, 2016, no. 20 (62), pp. 82-84. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26463653.
2. Belyaeva L. A. Material inequality in Russia. Reality and trends. Sociological research, 2007, no. 11, pp. 29-41. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=9916916.
3. Bessudnov A. R., Malik V. M. Socio-economic and gender inequality in the choice of educational trajectory after the end of the 9th grade of secondary school. The issue of education, 2016. – no. 1. – Pp. 135-167. (In Russian) DOI: 10.17323/1814-9545-2016-1-135-167 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25774649.
4. Bombardelli O. Education for sustainable development and peace. Bulletin of the Donetsk pedagogical Institute, 2017, no. 3, pp. 5-13. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35059625
5. Gorin D. G., Nitsevich V. F. Justice in education: social trends and management approach in a transforming society. Central Russian Bulletin of social Sciences, 2016, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 61-66. (In Russian) DOI:  10.12737/23971 URL:https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28201807.
6. Danilova E. N. Transformations of social policy and discourse of social justice in Russia. World of Russia, 2018, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 36-61. (In Russian) DOI: 10.17323/1811-038X-2018-27-2-36-61 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32811137
7. Dulina N. V. Youth of Russia: intent to justice (based on the results of applied sociological research). Primo aspect, 2017, no. 2 (30), pp. 7-14. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=34526029.
8. Evseev V. O. Methods of research work in the youth environment. Moscow, INFRA-M Publ., 2012, 237 p. (In Russian) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23983405
9. Evseev V. O. Innovative economy of the youth environment. Moscow, INFRA-M Publ., 2011, 342 p. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=19672322
10. Ilina O. A. the Concept of justice in the context of education. Personality, family and society: questions of pedagogy and psychology, 2015, no. 50-51, pp. 36-43. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=34064446
11. Kapuza A.V., Kersha Yu. D., Zakharov A. B., Havenson T. E. Educational results and social inequality in Russia: dynamics and connection with educational policy. The issue of education, 2017, no. 4, pp. 10-35. (In Russian)  (In Russian) DOI: 10.17323/1814-9545-2017-4-10-35 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35061790
12. Karchagin E. V. Norms of justice in the field of education. Bulletin of the Volgograd state University. Series 6: University education, 2013, no. 14, pp. 127-131. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=33333387
13. Kostyleva L. V. Inequality of the Russian population: trends, factors, regulation. Vologda, ISERT RAS Publ., 2011, 221 p. (In Russian)
14. Kosyakova Yu., Yastrebov G., Yanbarisova D., Kurakin D. Reproduction of social inequality in the Russian educational system. Journal of sociology and social anthropology, 2016, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 76-97.  (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29304953.
15. Leonidova G. V., Golovchin M. A. Trends in the development of education in the regions of Russia. Economic and social changes: facts, trends, forecast, 2013, no. 4 (28), pp. 43-52. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20263955.
16. Mruz A., Ocetkevich I., Tomchik L., Valotek-Shchchanska K., Rott D. Sustainable development in the curricula of secondary schools. The issue of education, 2020, no. 1, pp. 182-204. (In Russian) DOI: 10.17323/1814-9545-2020-1-182-204 URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42744441.
17. Kargapolova E. V. Education in the modern Russian region: quality, state, problems. Volgograd. Volgograd scientific publishing house Publ., 2013, 194 p. (In Russian)
18. Olshannikova N. A. Formation of modern value orientations in education. Bulletin of the Siberian state University of railway transport: humanitarian research, 2018, no.2 (4), pp. 54-59 (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37056206.
19. Popova L. V. Gender aspects of personal self-realization. Moscow, Prometheus Publ., 1996, 42 p. (In Russian)
20. Skvirsky V. Ya. On the question of the compromise between the principles of social justice and economic efficiency in education. Economics of education, 2012, no. 1, pp. 108-112. (In Russian)
21. Fursova V. V., khannanova D. H. Social inequality in the education system: domestic and foreign research theories. Moscow, Direct-Media Publ., 2013, 280 p. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22321057
22. Banks J. Multicultural education: Characteristics and goals. In J. Banks, C. Banks. (Eds.), Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives. Boston, Allyn & Bacon Publ., 1989, pp. 3-31.
23. Beane J.A., Apple M.W. The case for democratic schools. Lessons in powerful education. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Publ., 2007, pp. 1 – 29.
24. Bonilla-Molina L. Covid-19 on Route of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Postdigit Sci Educ, 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s42438-020-00179-4
25. Bourdieu P., Passeron J. C. Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture (2nd edn), London, Sage Publ., 1990, pp. 3-31.
26. Coleman J. S. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 1988, pp. 1-24.
27. Durkheim E. Socialism. New York, Collier Books Publ., 1962. 68 p.
28. Engelbrecht J., Borba M.C., Llinares S. et al. Will 2020 be remembered as the year in which education was changed? ZDM Mathematics Education, 2020, no. 52, 821–824. DOI: 10.1007/s11858-020-01185-3
29. Lopez-Agudo L.A., Ropero-García M.Á. Out-of-School Use of Time and Its Association with Gender Differences in Educational Outcomes. Child Ind Res, 2020, no.13, pp. 1335–1369. DOI: 10.1007/s12187-019-09701-y
30. Parker W. Teaching democracy: Unity and diversity in public life. New York, Teachers College Press Publ., 2003. Pp. 131-158.
31. Twenge J. M. Why today’s super-connected kids are growing up less rebellious, more tolerant, less happy – and completely unprepared for adulthood – and what that means for the rest of us. New York, Atria Books Publ., 2017, 406 p.
32. Wood G.H. Schools that work: America is most innovative public education programs. New York Plume Publ., 1992, 290 p.

For citation:

Davydova Yu. А., Kargapolova E.V., Denisenkova N.N. National project «Education» and implementation of the principle of fairness in secondary education, implementation of the principle of equity in secondary education. CITISE, 2020, no. 3, pp.228-242. DOI: http://doi.org/10.15350/2409-7616.2020.3.20