DOI: http://doi.org/10.15350/2409-7616.2020.1.43

Larisa V. Bykasova – Doctor of Education, Professor of Rostov State Economic University , Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation, SPIN code: 2544-6452, ORCID: 0000-0003-4866-1222, E-mail: moeve-25-moeve@yandex.ru

Vladimir V. Podberezny – Candidate of pedagogical Sciences, Professor of Rostov State Economic University, Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation., SPIN-code: 3736-0735, ORCID: 0000-0002-1590-1931, E-mail: podberes@mail.ru

Rimma V. Zarubina – Candidate of pedagogical Sciences, associate Professor of Rostov State Economic University, Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation, SPIN-code: 9905-7603, ORCID: 0000-0002-9494-7259, E-mail: r.zarubina@yandex.ru

Abstract.  From the essential approach position, the modern educational organization formation and performance are considered in the article as a scientific- educational, learning, socio-cultural object that meets the society requests; the modern teacher education priorities and development directions are determined; the development of the modern pedagogical knowledge prospects is emerged, which are formed under the new education paradigm conditions, which are characterized by digitalization, networking, distance transmission of information, the subject’s generation of all possible alternatives to reveal individual’s personal balance; the research process dynamics and methodological optics of a modern university is analyzed; the rational use of the teacher education available resources is discussed; the methodological practice and ways of the new practices subsequent multiplication in university education the system are reflected; the factors, affecting a modern subject education quality are established; the degree of the mediated product influence on the modern teacher university educational strategy implementation is determined; the training and educational tools of the marketable specialist are investigated; an approach is implemented that identifies a modern student in his/her development, which helps to determine the pedagogical matter motion state, to recreate a coherent picture of the available stocks and funds, necessary for the individual’s education at the qualitative. 

Keywords: flexible management, didactic potential, artificial environment, media, education system development.

References:   

1. Antipova A. N., Kvashnina S. I., Novikova S. O. Evaluation of quality indicators of test materials in order to improve the efficiency of knowledge control. Modern problems of science and education, 2008, no. 4, pp. 57-59. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=10607232
2. Bim-Bad B. M. Pedagogical anthropology: textbook and workshop for academic baccalaureate. Moscow, Yurayt Publ., 2019, 223 p. (In Russian)
3. Boguslavskij V., Neborsky E. V. The concept of higher education development in Russia. World of education, 2016, no. 5, pp. 7. (In Russian)  URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30096139
4. Bykasova L. V. Cognitive communication in the educational environment. Bulletin of the Siberian Institute of business and information technologies, 2016, no. 2, pp. 129-132. (In Russian) URL:  https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26202757
5. Bruner J. Culture of education. Moscow, Education Publ., 2006, 223 p. (In Russian)
6. Eissa M. M. Polarized discourse in the news. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014, no. 134, pp. 70-91. (In Russian)
7. Gershunsky S. Philosophy of education for the XXI century. Moscow, RU Publ., 2002, 512 p. (In Russian)
8. Gleason B., Gillern S. Digital Citizenship with Social Media: Participatory Practices of Teaching and Learning in Secondary Education. Educational Technology & Society, 2018, no. 21 (1), pp. 202. (In Russian)
9. Ivanenkov S. P. Actual problems of youth socialization. Moscow,Credo, 1997, no. 3, pp. 153-160. (In Russian)
10. Castels M. Information age: Economy, society and culture. Moscow, HSE, 2000, 608 p. (In Russian)
11. Chernyshev M. Yu., Zhuravleva A. M. Evolution of psychological approaches to developing education and training in high school: from destruction to integration of integrative sense-didactics. Integration of education, 2015, no. 4, pp. 108. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25013397
12. Khutorskoy A. V. Educational competences methodology and didactics. Moscow, Institute for Education Development Strategy of the Russian Academy of Education Publ., 2016, pp. 74-79. URL:  https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28280415
13. Korotenkov Yu. G. Information educational environment of primary school. Moscow, Academy Publ., 2013, 152 p. (In Russian)
14. Kornetov G. B. The formation of democratic pedagogy: the ascent to a socially active school. Moscow-Tver, Scientific book Publ., 2009, 184 p. (In Russian)
15. Kuznetsov N., Vovchenko N., Samoilov A. Bykasova L.  Reflection modulations in the media. Media Education, 2018, no. 1, pp. 39-45. URL:  https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32581383
16. Mardahaev L. V. The Subject-epistemological foundations of social pedagogic. Pedagogical education in Russia, 2016, no. 12, pp. 244-249. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28121113
17. Mudrik A.V. Socialization of man. Moscow: Academy, 2011б 624 p. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20110186
18. Pleshakov V. A. Theory of cybersocialization of the person. Monograph. Moscow, Moscow state pedagogical University Publ., 2011, 400 p. (In Russian)
19. Serikov V. V. Pedagogical research: in search of ways to improve the quality. Education and science, 2015, no. 7 (126), pp. 4-23. (In Russian) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24073929
20. Twissell A. Modelling and Simulating Electronics Knowledge: Conceptual Understanding and Learning through Active Agency. Educational Technology & Society, 2018, no. 21. pp. 111–123.

For citation:

Bykasova L.V., Podberezny V.V., Zarubina R.V. Modern education upgrade. CITISE, 2020, no. 1, pp. 474-481. DOI: http://doi.org/10.15350/2409-7616.2020.1.43