ISSN 2409-7616

O. Ganina, O. Ivanchuk

THEORETICAL BASES OF METHODS OF FORMING MEDICAL JUDGMENT AMONG FUTURE DOCTORS WHEN STUDYING PHYSICS IN A UNIVERSITY

Olga G. Ganina – Head teacher of chair of physics, mathematics and medical informatics of Astrakhan State Medical Academy (Russia, Astrakhan), ORCID: 0000-0001-8417-9965, E-mail: aljapkina_olja@mail.ru

Olga V. Ivanchuk – Doctor of Education, Associate Professor, Head of chair of physics, mathematics and medical informatics, Federal State Budgetary Institution of Higher Education Astrakhan State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia (Russia, Astrakhan), RSCI SPIN-code: 4207-9363 / ORCID: 0000-0002-1614-7483, E-mail: olgaiva.2401@gmail.com

Abstract. The given article presents a study that formed a basis for creating a model for teaching physics in a medical university. The presented model is a synergy of the tendency of competency-based approach aimed at forming a set of competencies as abilities and readiness for future professional activity of medical students with a historically established approach in teaching future doctors in Russian and foreign practice. Theoretical basis of the given study became the authors’ early definition of medical judgment. It is the medical judgment that allowed us to reasonably formulate the main intersection points of competencies as elements of medical judgment. The model first used a methodological approach on forming medical judgment that had previously been used exclusively in clinical chairs. Thus, the theoretical basis of the study is the active method of working with students in the form of a situational approach that is implemented through a case study, which concordantly combines trends in the development of modern education. The authors prove with their model that the cognition methods that are generated in physics classes do not contradict the main stages of a doctor’s activity and promote its structuredness and awareness. All this positively affected the results of the introduction of the given model. The evaluation of these methods was carried out with the help of the selected diagnostic criteria, which allows characterizing the presented model as the relevant one for the introduction into the educational process of a medical university.

Keywords: medical judgment, teaching physics the students of medical universities.

 

References:

  1. L. Likhterman On medical judgment // Medical newspaper. 2000. № 41.
  2. V. Andronov. Psychological bases of forming a doctor’s professional thinking .П // Psychology issues. 1991. – № 4. – P. 88-95.
  3.  I. Agafonova, O. Mirzabekova. Formation of diagnostic competencies among medical university students while teaching physics // A human and education. 2015. № 4 (45). P. 103-107.
  4. G. Bezrodnaya, D. Sevostyanov, T. Shpiks Principles of competency approach in a medical university // Journal of Siberian Medical Sciences. 2008. №2.
  5. T. Zabolotskikh, V. Skibitsky. D. Sirotenko, P. Lapshina. Forming professional medical judgment among the graduates of medical universities // International magazine of experimental education №4, 2013 112-114.
  6. B. Karvasarsky. Medical psychology. Leningrad. Medicine, 1982, 128p.
  7. V. Tashlykov. Psychological protection among neurosis and psychophysiological disorder patients. Medical manual. –S. Petersburg, 1992. 87p.
  8. N. Tvorogova. Psychology: Lectures for medical university students / First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University) – Moscow: Russian academic center methodic center on continuous medical and pharmaceutical education, 1998.
  9. S. Tolstov. Acmeological approach to the analysis of the problem of mastering professionalism of health officials in the system of graduate studies. – Ivanovo, Publishing house: Ivanovo state university, 2001. 116p.
  10. B. Yasko. Psychology of a doctor’s personality and work. Course of lectures. – Moscow: Feniks, 2005. 304 p.
  11. E. Kirilenko. Medical judgment and experience: Variations on Foucault //Independent psychiatric magazine, 2003. -№3. P. 18-27
  12. A. Bilibin, G. Tsaregorodtsev. Medical judgment: sketches of clinical assertions//Russian messenger of perinatal medicine and pediatrics. 2003. -№1. P. 15-18.
  13. Karthikeyan, Ganesan; Medical judgment and evidence-based medicine: time for reconciliation. Pais, Prem, Indian Journal of Medical Research, Report, 9INDI, Nov 1, 2010.
  14. Yu. Abaev. Doctor’s intuition // Clinical medicine, № 12, 2012. P.14-18.
  15. S. Ozhegov. The Dictionary of the Russian Language. Moscow; 1986, 567p.
  16. Selye H. From a dream to a discovery. How to become a scientist: Translation from English. Moscow; 1987.
  17. T. Novikova, O. Vorobeichikova. Model of computer education of doctors // Higher education in Russia, Мoscow: № 3, 2010 P.102-108
  18. R.Hagglin. Differential diagnosis of internal diseases. Мoscow, 1997, 794 p.
  19. S. Grishunin. Is the modern science possible without intuition: Models of creative intuition in the context of science, philosophy and forecasting. Moscow: Publishing house LKI, 2008. 160p.
  20. L. Kessler L. “In a High Tech Age, is Medical judgment a Lost Art Form?” Surg. Neurology. – 1999. – Vol. 52, N 1. – P. 22-23.
  21. V. Petrov. “Clinical oncology, 2012 . -N 1. -P. 15-32.
  22. V. Petrov. Medical judgment and evidence-based medicine//Medical education and professional development. 2012. № 1. P. 15-32. URL: http://medobr. ru/en/jarticles/136 html?SSr=01013352a3072100070927c_20fe339a (access date: 12.07.2018)
  23. G. Chelpanov. Textbook on logics. Мoscow, 1911, 237 p.