Victor Maltsev – candidate of biological sciences, associate professor of the Department of Mathematics, Natural Science and Methods of Teaching Mathematics and Natural History of the South Ural State Humanitarian Pedagogical University, (Russia, Chelyabinsk), RSCI SPIN-code: 5691-3454 (ORCID: 0000-0002-2453-6585), e-mail: maltsevvp@cspu.ru

Natalia Belousova – Doctor of Biological Sciences, Head of the Department of Mathematics, Natural Science and Methods of Teaching Mathematics and Natural History of the South Ural State Humanitarian Pedagogical University, (Russia, Chelyabinsk), RSCI SPIN-code: 8955-3071 (ORCID: 0000-0001-9873-320x), e-mail: belousova@cspu.ru

Maya Tupikova – postgraduate student of the South Ural State Humanitarian and Pedagogical University (Russia, Chelyabinsk), (ORCID: 0000-0002-6920-8286), e-mail: pcholkamayia@mail.ru

Abstract. In the modern educational space, the issue of preserving the health of students remains urgent. Reducing the physical activity of adolescents, as well as the problems of dosing physical activity, are at the centre of attention of educators, the scientific community and parents. The subject of the study was the state of psycho-physiological status of adolescents as a criterion for successful implementation to learning. The goal of the research is to develop an effective program for physical education, taking into account the psycho-physiological status of adolescents. “Biomysh-research” (“Neurolab”, Moscow). The data of psychomotor indices of healthy adolescents aged 11-12 years are obtained in the dynamics of the implementation of the program on physical culture. The structure of the proposed program for physical education allows taking into account the individual typological characteristics of schoolchildren. Methodological approach to the development of programs for physical education on the basis of psychophysiological status can be used in the health-saving environment of an educational institution.

Key words: program on physical culture, psychophysiological status, gender characteristics, younger adolescents.

References:

1. Ageevec A.V., Efimov-Komarov V.YU., Efimova-Komarova L.B. Fizicheskaya kul’tura v zerkale razvitiya obrazovatel’nyh standartov // Uchenye zapiski universiteta Lesgafta. 2016. – №2 (132). – S. 8-20.
2. Ajdarkin E.K., Pavlovskaya M.A., Starostin A.N. Vliyanie funkcional’nogo sostoyaniya na ehffektivnost’ sensomotornoj integracii // Valeologiya. 2011. – № 4. – S. 75-102.
3. Bajguzhin P. A. Faktory rezul’tativnosti psihofiziologicheskogo issledovaniya funkcional’nogo sostoyaniya central’noj nervnoj sistemy u studentov // CHelovek. Sport. Medicina. 2011. №26 (243). – S. 131-135.
4. Belousova N.A., SHibkov A.A., Bajguzhin P.A. Analiz sostoyaniya detej i podrostkov, prozhivayushchih v usloviyah promyshlennogo megapolisa // Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: EHkologiya i bezopasnost’ zhiznedeyatel’nosti. 2013. – № 2. – S. 38-43.
5. Budarin M.V., Kejno A.YU. Vozdejstvie sredstvami plavaniya na dvigatel’nuyu programmu detej 8–12 let s umstvennoj otstalost’yu // Vestnik TGU. 2013. – №4 (120). – S. 276-283.
6. Veterok E.V. Osobennosti sensomotornoj integracii u normativno razvivayushchihsya podrostkov i podrostkov s izmenennoj seksual’noj orientaciej // Psihologiya obrazovaniya v polikul’turnom prostranstve. 2010. T. 1. – № 1. – S. 149-153.
7. Gileva O.B. Izmenchivost’ vremeni reakcii i akademicheskaya uspeshnost’ uchashchihsya v raznyh shkolah Ekaterinburga // EHkologiya cheloveka. 2011. – №10. – S. 22-28.
8. Gorskaya I.YU., Suyangulova L.A. Bazovye koordinacionnye sposobnosti shkol’nikov s razlichnym urovnem zdorov’ya. – Omsk; SIBGAFK, 2000, – 210 s.
9. Gribanov A.V., Kozhevnikova I.S., Nekhoroshkova A.N., Dzhos YU.S. Latentnoe vremya sensomotornyh reakcij u detej 10-11 let s vysokim urovnem trevozhnosti // EHkologiya cheloveka. 2011. – №1. – S. 46-50.
10. Zaporozhanova A.A. Obosnovanie pokazatelej kontrolya psihofiziologicheskogo sostoyaniya tennisistov 12-15 let // Pedagogika, psihologiya i mediko-biologicheskie problemy fizicheskogo vospitaniya i sporta. 2007. – №7. – S. 53-57.
11. Kamenskaya V.G. Prakticheskij opyt ispol’zovaniya metodov toch-nyh nauk v izuchenii intellektual’noj deyatel’nosti normal’no razvivayushchihsya detej i ih sverstnikov s rechevymi rasstrojstva-mi // Izvestiya RGPU. Psihol. i ped. nauki. 2002. № 3. S. 89-95.
12. Krivolapchuk I.A. Kondicionnye dvigatel’nye sposobnosti i nespecificheskaya reaktivnost’ detej mladshego shkol’nogo vozrasta na razlichnye vidy nagruzok // Novye issledovaniya. 2008. – №17. – S. 39-51.
13. Malkov V.V. Podvizhnaya igra kak forma i metod v fizicheskom vospitanii uchashchihsya // Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pedagogika. Psihologiya. Sociokinetika. 2008. – №1. – S.123-126.
14. Mardahaev L.V. Social’noe zdorov’e podrastayushchego pokoleniya i neobhodimost’ ego formirovaniya // Pedagogicheskoe iskusstvo. 2017. – №1. – S. 67-71.
15. Mezencev V.V. Ponyatie o psihomotornyh sposobnostyah i ih vzaimosvyaz’ s psihologicheskimi komponentami lichnosti starshih shkol’nikov gimnazii // Uchenye zapiski universiteta Lesgafta. 2009. №12. – S. 71-74.
16. Russak YU.A. Osobennosti sensomotornoj integracii devushek 14-17 let s raznym tempom polovogo sozrevaniya // Izvestiya Rossijskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A.I. Gercena. 2009. Vyp. 113. – S. 278-283.
17. Semenyak O.V. Issledovanie vnutrivozrastnyh izmenenij psihomotornoj i kognitivnoj sfer podrostka // Izvestiya RGPU im. A.I. Gercena. 2008. – №49. – S. 365-368.
18. Smirnova V.S., Mal’cev V.P. Gendernye osobennosti plastichnosti nervnyh processov mladshih podrostkov 11-13 let // Novye issledovaniya. 2016. – № 1 (46). – S. 37-46.
19. Sudakov K.V. Sistemnaya organizaciya funkcij cheloveka: teoreticheskie aspekty // Uspekhi fiziologicheskih nauk. – 2000. – T. 31, № 1. – S. 81-96.
20. Tokmasheva M.A., Makarova L.N. Variativnaya chast’ programmy po fizicheskoj kul’ture dlya shkol’nikov s uchetom ih ehtnicheskih osobennostej i urovnya fizicheskogo razvitiya // Sibirskij pedagogicheskij zhurnal. 2011. – №2. – S. 180-190.
21. Firsin S.A. Faktory, vliyayushchie na otnoshenie shkol’nikov k urokam fizkul’tury // Uchenye zapiski universiteta Lesgafta. 2015. – №1 (119). – S. 182-184.
22. SHutova S.V., Murav’eva I.V. Sensomotornye reakcii kak harakteristika funkcional’nogo sostoyaniya CNS // Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Estestvennye i tekhnicheskie nauki. 2013. – №5-3. – S. 2831 –2840.